677
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

In vitro and in silico inhibition performance of choline against CYP1A2, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4

, , , &
Pages 925-932 | Received 04 Jul 2022, Accepted 31 Oct 2022, Published online: 14 Nov 2022

Figures & data

Table 1. Predicted CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 inhibition potency of choline and the positive controls with the DL-CYP Prediction Server.

Figure 1. Effect of choline on CYP1A2 activity in vitro. Five concentrations of choline and α-naphthoflavone (as a selective inhibitor) were assayed: 0.150, 0.250, 0.500, 0.750, and 1 µmol/L. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 vs. control (pure CYP1A2).

Figure 1. Effect of choline on CYP1A2 activity in vitro. Five concentrations of choline and α-naphthoflavone (as a selective inhibitor) were assayed: 0.150, 0.250, 0.500, 0.750, and 1 µmol/L. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 vs. control (pure CYP1A2).

Figure 2. Effect of choline on CYP2D6 in vitro. Five concentrations of choline and quinidine (as a selective inhibitor) were assayed: 0.150, 0.250, 0.500, 0.750, and 1 µmol/L. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 vs. control (pure CYP2D6).

Figure 2. Effect of choline on CYP2D6 in vitro. Five concentrations of choline and quinidine (as a selective inhibitor) were assayed: 0.150, 0.250, 0.500, 0.750, and 1 µmol/L. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 vs. control (pure CYP2D6).

Figure 3. Effect of choline on CYP3A4 activity in vitro. Five concentrations of choline and ketoconazole (as a selective inhibitor) were assayed: 0.150, 0.250, 0.500, 0.750, and 1 µmol/L. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 vs. control (pure CYP3A4).

Figure 3. Effect of choline on CYP3A4 activity in vitro. Five concentrations of choline and ketoconazole (as a selective inhibitor) were assayed: 0.150, 0.250, 0.500, 0.750, and 1 µmol/L. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 vs. control (pure CYP3A4).

Table 2. Scoring method, docking scores, participating active residues and distance from the heme structure in docking simulations of choline in the active site of CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 employing XP, IFD, and MM/GBSA recalculations (Schrödinger Inc.).

Figure 4. Visualized major intermolecular interactions of choline in the active sites of CYP1A2 (A, B), CYP2D6 (C, D), and CYP3A4 (E, F) after employing IFD and MM/GBSA recalculations. The interactions are provided in both 2D and 3 D forms. The enzyme structures are depicted in green, and the heme group is given in red colored sticks.

Figure 4. Visualized major intermolecular interactions of choline in the active sites of CYP1A2 (A, B), CYP2D6 (C, D), and CYP3A4 (E, F) after employing IFD and MM/GBSA recalculations. The interactions are provided in both 2D and 3 D forms. The enzyme structures are depicted in green, and the heme group is given in red colored sticks.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (830.5 KB)