734
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Comparative study of the bond strength of ZirCAD Multi and ZirCAD Prime ceramics with different types of cements

, &
Article: 2234501 | Received 10 May 2023, Accepted 05 Jul 2023, Published online: 14 Jul 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Dentin discs slices.

Figure 1. Dentin discs slices.

Figure 2. Sintered zirconia cylinders.

Figure 2. Sintered zirconia cylinders.

Figure 3. Side view (a) and top view (b) of 3D printed cylinder.

Figure 3. Side view (a) and top view (b) of 3D printed cylinder.

Figure 4. The experimental setup (a) with a window for light polymerization (b).

Figure 4. The experimental setup (a) with a window for light polymerization (b).

Figure 5. Side view (a) and top view (b) of experimental setup with 500 g standard weight.

Figure 5. Side view (a) and top view (b) of experimental setup with 500 g standard weight.

Figure 6. The packaged ceramic-dentin construction (1 – packaging material/epoxy resin; 2 – dentin block; 3 – cementing agent; 4 – zirconia body; 5 – packaging material/epoxy resin).

Figure 6. The packaged ceramic-dentin construction (1 – packaging material/epoxy resin; 2 – dentin block; 3 – cementing agent; 4 – zirconia body; 5 – packaging material/epoxy resin).

Figure 7. The packaged construction after the final radial cut and the released test samples.

Figure 7. The packaged construction after the final radial cut and the released test samples.

Table 1. Comparative tensile bond strength analysis of studied cement types applied to sandblasted ceramic IPS e.max ZirCAD Prime and IPS e.max ZirCAD Multi.

Table 2. Comparative tensile bond strength analysis of studied cement types applied to non-sandblasted ceramic IPS e.max ZirCAD Prime and IPS e.max ZirCAD Multi.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.