‘Any male victim?’ The legacy of conflating paedophilia and homosexuality and the differential seriousness of sexual abuse by victim gender

Figures & data

Table A1. Demographics of men with multiple, exclusively female child victims (MFV).

Case	Age (years)	Ethnicity	Religion	Official victims	Unreported victims	Total victims	Sexually dangerous person
F1	49	White	Protestant	8	2	10	No
F2	34	White	Catholic	8	0	8	Yes
F3	26	White	Protestant	7	15	22	Yes
F4	53	White	Catholic	5	0	5	Yes
F5	37	White	Protestant	6^a	6	12	No
F6	43	White	Protestant	7	0	7	Yes
F7	24	White	Catholic	5	40	45	Yes
F8	29	Black	Catholic	3	0	3	No
F9	42	Mixed	Catholic	7	0	7	Yes
F10	21	White	Catholic	3	0	3	Yes
Total	Mean			59	63	122	7

^aMean substitution was used to approximate the number of unofficial victims in one case where ‘some’ victims were indicated, yet the exact number was unstated. Estimate was rounded to the nearest person.

Table A2. Demographics of men with multiple, exclusively male child victims (MMV).

Case	Age (years)	Ethnicity	Religion	Official victims	Unreported victims	Total victims	Sexually dangerous person
M 1	29	White	Catholic	7	4^a	11	No
M2	22	White	Protestant	3	4^a	7	No
M3	44	White	Protestant	6	30	36	Yes
M4	21	White	Protestant	3	1	4	Yes
M5	19	White	Catholic	4	2	6	Yes
M6	34	White	Protestant	9	2	11	Yes
M7	27	White	Protestant	6	3	9	No
M8	31	White	Catholic	4	15	19	Yes
M9	32	White	Catholic	6	0	6	Yes
M10	21	White	Protestant	11	0	11	Yes
M11	21	White	Catholic	9	0	9	Yes
M12	35	White	Protestant	4	0	4	Yes
M13	64	White	Protestant	12	0	12	Yes
M14	18	White	Catholic	6	0	6	Yes
Total				85	61	146	11

^aMean substitution was used to approximate the number of unofficial victims in two cases where ‘some’ victims were indicated, yet the exact number was unstated. Estimate was rounded to the nearest person.