Figures & data
Table 1. Contact with mother, father, mother-in-law, father-in-law, sister(s), brother(s), sisters’ child(ren), and brothers’ child(ren), overall and by different contact forms, in the younger generation. Mean and (standard deviation).
Table 2. The older generation’s contact frequencies, overall and by different contact forms, with: children, by dyads of mother-daughter, father-daughter, mother-son, and father-son; grandchildren by grandparent types; and sisters, brothers, sisters’ child(ren), and brothers’ child(ren). Mean and (standard deviation).
Figure 1. Associations between face-to-face, phone, letter or postcard contact and digital contact for mother, father, mother-in-law, and father-in-law. Younger generation. ß-coefficients and 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 2. Associations between face-to-face, phone, letter or postcard contact and digital contact for sisters, brothers, sisters’ child(ren), and brother’s child(ren). Younger generation. ß-coefficients and 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 3. Associations between face-to-face, phone, letter or postcard contact and digital contact for the dyads of mother-daughter, father-daughter, mother-son, and father-son. Older generation. ß-coefficients and 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 4. Associations between face-to-face, phone, letter or postcard contact and digital contact for maternal grandmother (MGM), maternal grandfather (MGF), paternal grandmother (PMG), and paternal grandfather (PGF). Older generation. ß-coefficients and 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 5. Association between face-to-face, phone, letter or postcard contact and digital contact for sister, brother, sisters’ child(ren), and brothers’ child(ren). Older generation. ß-coefficients and 95% confidence intervals.
Appendix Table 1. Contact with mother, father, mother-in-law, father-in-law, sister(s), brother(s), sisters’ child(ren), and brothers’ child(ren), by video call and text message, in the younger generation. Mean and (standard deviation).
Appendix Table 2. The older generation’s contact frequencies, by video calls and text messages, with: children, by dyads of mother-daughter, father-daughter, mother-son, and father-son; grandchildren by grandparent types; and sisters, brothers, sisters’ child(ren), and brothers’ child(ren). Mean and (standard deviation).
Appendix Table 3. Associations between face-to-face, phone, letter or postcard contact and digital contact for mother, father, mother-in-law and father-in-law, younger generation.
Appendix Table 4. Associations between face-to-face, phone, letter or postcard contact and digital contact for sister, brother, sister’s children, brother’s children, younger generation.
Appendix Table 5. Associations between face-to-face, phone, letter or postcard contact and digital contact for the dyads of mother-daughter, father-daughter, mother-son, father-son, older generation.
Appendix Table 6. Associations between face-to-face, phone, letter or postcard contact and digital contact for maternal grandmother, maternal grandfather, paternal grandmother, paternal grandfather, older generation
Appendix Table 7. Association between face-to-face, phone, letter or postcard contact and digital contact for sister, brother, sister’s children, brother’s children, older generation.