Figures & data
Figure 1. Possible roles of scientists in science and policy (adapted from Pielke Citation2007, p. 51)
Figure 2. An integrated theoretical-conceptual model of the interactions between scientists and policy, based on policy processes and activities that scientists can engage in as part of policy analysis and policy analytics (Daniell, Morton, and Rios Insua Citation2016); Pielke’s (Citation2007) model of the modes or stances for scientists, as modified byCrouzat et al. (Citation2018) and Schwartz et al.’s (Citation2012) universal theory of held human values that determine interests, dispositions, preferences and individual ethical frameworks for action
Figure 3. Summary diagram of the multiple causes of the fish death events in the lower Darling River in 2018–2019. Modified from Vertessy et al. (Citation2019a, –1 therein)
Figure 4. Social network diagrams for the signatories of the open letter (a–c) and witnesses at the Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission (d–f), for co-authorship (a, d), institutional affiliations including membership of CRCs, research teams etc. (categories detailed above under ‘A social network analysis’); (b, e) and links to government (c, f). MDB = past or present member of an MDBA committee; CEW = member of CEWO committee or LTIM Project; Con = owner or director of consultancy that has worked for MDBA or CEWO; Gov. = membership of other government advisory committees; PS = former Federal or State public servant
