1,016
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Quality of the development of self-report instruments assessing women’s antepartum expectations of motherhood: a systematic review

, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 74-94 | Received 03 Feb 2022, Accepted 22 Jul 2022, Published online: 03 Nov 2022

Figures & data

Table 1. COSMIN Definitions of measurement properties.

Table 2. Updated criteria for good measurement properties.

Table 3. COSMIN Definitions of quality levels using the modified GRADE approach.

Table 4. Recommendations for future use and development of instruments per category.

Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram showing study selection process and exclusion criteria.

Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram showing study selection process and exclusion criteria.

Table 5. Characteristics of included self-report instruments.

Table 6. Synthesis of quality of studies on a measurement property, pooled ratings of results, and the quality of evidence (GRADE).

Table 7. Recommendations per instrument.

Supplemental material

Appendix A Search strategy

Download MS Word (20.5 KB)

Appendix B Methods quality assessment

Download MS Word (21.5 KB)

Appendix C Detailed quality assessment

Download MS Word (21.2 KB)

Appendix D Sample characteristics

Download MS Word (21.2 KB)