476
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Allegiance effects in cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): a systematic review and meta-analysis

& ORCID Icon
Pages 79-93 | Received 04 Jun 2023, Accepted 18 Apr 2024, Published online: 13 May 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process.

Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process.

Table 1. Study characteristics.

Table 2. Allegiance scoring tool.

Figure 2. Forest plot of effect sizes for cognitive processing therapy (N = 20 studies).

The posttreatment scores for (Sloan et al., Citation2018) were at 12 weeks for cognitive processing therapy (CPT) and 6-weeks for written exposure therapy (WET), given that the WET intervention was only a 6-week intervention.
The above forest plot includes 17 studies with an active comparison group (including treatment as usual; TAU) and three studies with a waiting list comparison group. The summary effect size should thus be interpreted with caution.
AD = adaptive disclosure; CPT = cognitive processing therapy; DBT = dialectical behaviour therapy; PCT = present-centered therapy; PE = prolonged exposure; TAU = treatment as usual; WA = written accounts; WET = written exposure therapy; WL = waiting list.
Figure 2. Forest plot of effect sizes for cognitive processing therapy (N = 20 studies).

Figure 3. Regression plot of effect size on allegiance difference scores.

Figure 3. Regression plot of effect size on allegiance difference scores.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (374.7 KB)

Data availability statement

The data used in the present study are available from the authors upon request.