Knowledge of the situation, social network and knowledge sharing in Peshawar University: an empirical study

Figures & data

Figure 1. Individual situation awareness model (Salas et al., 1995, p. 126).

Figure 2. Conceptual model of the study. Source: Authors’ own.

Table 1. Age of the faculty members (N = 244).

Valid	Frequency	Percent	Valid percent	Cumulative percent
36–45	67	27.5	27.5	54.1
46–55	83	34.0	34.0	88.1
56 and above	29	11.9	11.9	100.0
Total	244	100.0	100.0

Table 2. Gender of the faculty members (N = 244).

Valid	Frequency	Percent	Valid percent	Cumulative percent
Female	130	53.3	53.3	53.3
Male	114	46.7	46.7	100.0
Total	244	100.0	100.0

Table 3. Designation of the faculty members (N = 244).

Valid	Frequency	Percent	Valid percent	Cumulative percent
AP	107	43.9	43.9	76.6
Prof	57	23.4	23.4	100.0
Total	244	100.0	100.0

Table 4. Total experience of the faculty members (N = 244).

Valid	Frequency	Percent	Valid percent	Cumulative percent
1–5 years	48	19.7	19.7	19.7
6–10 years	43	17.6	17.6	37.3
11–15 years	49	20.1	20.1	57.4
16–20 years	44	18.0	18.0	75.4
21–25 years	43	17.6	17.6	93.0
25 and above	17	7.0	7.0	100.0
Total	244	100.0	100.0

Table 5. Means and standard deviations for the constructs (N = 244).

Variables	Minimum	Maximum	Mean	St. dev.
Attitude towards KS	1	5	18	5
Individual perception	1	5	11	3
Knowledge sharing	1	5	18	5

Table 6. Regression model fit statistics.

Unstandardized coefficients		T	Sig.
B	Std. error
1.447	0.189	7.647	0.000
0.508	0.035	14.681	0.000
0.114	0.053	2.140	0.033

Salas, E., Prince, C., Baker, D. P., & Shrestha, L. (1995). Situation awareness in team performance: Implications for measurement and training. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 123–136.

 Web of Science ®Google Scholar