Modelling the impact of intellectual property protection and spillovers on attracting foreign direct investment

Figures & data

Figure 1. Bolstering I.P.R. protections encourages F.D.I. inflows when $\mathit{\Psi }>\mathit{\Phi }.$

Source: this study.

Figure 2. I.P.R. protection creates ambiguous effects on F.D.I. inflows when $\Psi <\Phi .$

Source: this study.

Table 1. Correlation between I.P.R. and inward F.D.I. flows.

Developing economy		Developed economy
Country	Correlation coefficient	Country	Correlation coefficient
CHN	0.433	NLD	0.672
IND	0.242	USA	0.656
BRA	0.040	JPN	0.165
IDN	0.700	AUS	−0.764
MEX	0.608	CZE	−0.499
TUR	0.462	GBR	−0.106

Data source: OECD and W.E.F. Correlation coefficients are calculated by the author.

Figure 3. Welfare under self-sourcing is higher when m is large. ($\Psi >\Phi$).

Source: this study.

Figure 4. Welfare under self-sourcing is higher when m is large. ($\Psi <\Phi$).

Source: this study.