The investigation of sustainable environmental performance of manufacturing companies: mediating role of organizational support and moderating role of CSR

Figures & data

Figure 1. China Environment Performance Index Country Scorecard.

Source: Authors.

Table 1. Demographic Details.

Respondent profile		(n = 510)
Characteristics	Distribution	Frequency	(%)
Gender	Female	197	0.39
	Male	288	0.56
	Prefer not to say	25	0.05
Qualification	Undergraduate	129	0.25
	Graduate	164	0.32
	Postgraduate	136	0.27
	Others	81	0.16
Age (years)	20 − 29	187	0.37
	30 − 39	148	0.29
	40 − 49	113	0.22
	More than 50	62	0.12
Job experience (years)	0 − 5	131	0.26
	6 − 10	162	0.32
	11 − 15	119	0.23
	More than 15	98	0.19

Source: Authors.

Figure 2. Research model.

Source: Authors.

Table 2. Convergent validity.

Constructs	Items	Loadings	Alpha	CR	AVE
Corporate social responsibilities	CSR1	0.886	0.845	0.820	0.536
	CSR2	0.669
	CSR4	0.676
	CSR5	0.675
Green entrepreneurial orientation	GEO1	0.912	0.944	0.956	0.782
	GEO2	0.824
	GEO3	0.903
	GEO4	0.902
	GEO5	0.912
	GEO7	0.849
Organizational ambidexterity	OA1	0.958	0.966	0.975	0.908
	OA2	0.943
	OA3	0.952
	OA4	0.959
Organizational support	OS1	0.954	0.959	0.968	0.835
	OS2	0.826
	OS3	0.953
	OS4	0.955
	OS5	0.825
	OS6	0.955
Social entrepreneurship	SE1	0.874	0.909	0.936	0.785
	SE2	0.881
	SE3	0.887
	SE4	0.901
Sustainable environmental performance	SEP1	0.810	0.889	0.918	0.692
	SEP2	0.815
	SEP3	0.855
	SEP4	0.815
	SEP5	0.864

Source: Authors.

Figure 3. Measurement model assessment.

Source: Authors.

Table 3. Fornell Larcker.

	CSR	GEO	OA	OS	SE	SEP
CSR	0.732
GEO	0.395	0.884
OA	0.336	0.470	0.953
OS	0.399	0.849	0.486	0.914
SE	0.335	0.386	0.384	0.363	0.886
SEP	0.325	0.506	0.407	0.498	0.370	0.832

Source: Authors.

Table 4. Cross-loadings.

	CSR	GEO	OA	OS	SE	SEP
CSR1	0.886	0.458	0.828	0.469	0.372	0.378
CSR2	0.669	0.134	0.267	0.105	0.121	0.090
CSR4	0.676	0.081	0.264	0.102	0.109	0.099
CSR5	0.675	0.113	0.243	0.096	0.119	0.071
GEO1	0.331	0.912	0.391	0.736	0.341	0.447
GEO2	0.362	0.824	0.434	0.775	0.329	0.465
GEO3	0.356	0.903	0.445	0.723	0.346	0.446
GEO4	0.352	0.902	0.440	0.731	0.340	0.452
GEO5	0.327	0.912	0.381	0.735	0.338	0.434
GEO7	0.361	0.849	0.400	0.794	0.353	0.438
OA1	0.713	0.448	0.958	0.468	0.339	0.399
OA2	0.705	0.444	0.943	0.450	0.401	0.360
OA3	0.718	0.448	0.952	0.462	0.387	0.391
OA4	0.709	0.453	0.959	0.471	0.343	0.401
OS1	0.367	0.772	0.450	0.954	0.316	0.450
OS2	0.353	0.776	0.429	0.826	0.359	0.463
OS3	0.368	0.770	0.452	0.953	0.319	0.456
OS4	0.375	0.776	0.449	0.955	0.317	0.444
OS5	0.352	0.776	0.430	0.825	0.360	0.459
OS6	0.368	0.773	0.446	0.955	0.313	0.449
SE1	0.314	0.307	0.322	0.292	0.874	0.340
SE2	0.276	0.351	0.350	0.342	0.881	0.339
SE3	0.290	0.341	0.330	0.306	0.887	0.327
SE4	0.308	0.369	0.359	0.345	0.901	0.305
SEP1	0.334	0.473	0.378	0.493	0.295	0.810
SEP2	0.288	0.455	0.350	0.403	0.305	0.815
SEP3	0.242	0.369	0.296	0.397	0.284	0.855
SEP4	0.214	0.392	0.330	0.359	0.335	0.815
SEP5	0.261	0.402	0.330	0.403	0.321	0.864

Source: Authors.

Table 5. HeterotraitMonotrait (HTMT) ratio.

	CSR	GEO	OA	OS	SE	SEP
CSR
GEO	0.266
OA	0.537	0.492
OS	0.259	0.690	0.504
SE	0.249	0.416	0.411	0.388
SEP	0.220	0.548	0.436	0.535	0.411

Source: Authors.

Figure 4. Structural model assessment.

Source: Authors.

Figure 5. Interaction graph.

Source: Authors.

Table 6. A path analysis.

Relationships	Beta	S.D.	T Statistics	P values	L.L.	U.L.
GEO → SEP	0.246	0.103	2.394	0.009	0.049	0.386
OA → SEP	0.154	0.092	1.672	0.049	0.020	0.319
OS*CSR → SEP	−0.186	0.054	3.470	0.000	−0.280	−0.102
SE → SEP	0.187	0.063	2.953	0.002	0.074	0.285
GEO → OS → SEP	0.108	0.052	2.077	0.014	0.009	0.263
SE → OS → SEP	0.105	0.046	2.282	0.011	0.002	0.325

Source: Authors.