647
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Socioecnomics, Planning, and Management

Effects of managed forest versus unmanaged forest on physiological restoration from a stress stimulus, and the relationship with individual traits

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 77-85 | Received 30 Oct 2018, Accepted 20 Feb 2019, Published online: 19 Mar 2019
 

ABSTRACT

“Forest bathing” can evoke positive physiological responses and relieve stress. We investigated how restoration from a stress stimulus is affected by forest management and an individual’s personal traits. For the study, we recruited 17 males and took them to either an unmanaged forest (UF) with densely packed trees or a managed forest (MF) with improved light and visibility. We assessed their personality traits and depressive tendencies by the NEO Five-Factor Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory, respectively. The participants performed a static hand grip stress exercise for 2 min at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, and viewed the forest for 15 min. Their blood pressure (BP) and saliva cortisol increased after the stimulus but then significantly decreased after viewing, with significantly lower levels in the MF than in the UF (p < 0.05). Their heart rate (HR) remained unchanged throughout viewing, irrespective of the forest condition. The ratio of low-frequency to high-frequency HR variability, indicative parasympathetic nerve activity, significantly increased by the last 5 min of viewing in the UF (p < 0.05), whereas it decreased in the MF. Difference in systolic BP between after the stimulus and after viewing was related to neuroticism and depression scores in the UF, but not in the MF. These findings provide useful information for the future application of forest management and indicate that an MF may have greater beneficial effects than a UF for restoration from physiological stress and that these positive effects may be partly related to individual personal traits.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate all respondents who took time and effort for this study. Yamanashi Institute of Environmental Sciences] (to Masahiro Horiuchi), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science under Grant [number 26400268] (to Masahiro Horiuchi); and [Yamaguchi Scholarship Foundation] (to Haruo Saito and Akio Fujiwara) supported this work. We express our gratitude to the following for their help in organizing the experiments and in giving us useful suggestions through their discussion: Kazutaka Murase, Norio Nishiyama, Junko Endo, Yuko Asano, Susumu Goto, YukiWatanabe, Mari Takahashi, and Junko Saito.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [26400268]; Yamaguchi Scholarship Foundation [nothing];Yamanashi Institute of Environmental Sciences [nothing].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 159.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.