25,912
Views
86
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Crop Physiology

Revisiting rice breeding methods – evaluating the use of rapid generation advance (RGA) for routine rice breeding

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 337-352 | Received 21 Jul 2017, Accepted 29 Sep 2017, Published online: 03 Nov 2017

Figures & data

Table 1. Rice varieties developed by RGA.

Figure 1. Countries using RGA in rice breeding (based on 2015 survey).

Figure 1. Countries using RGA in rice breeding (based on 2015 survey).

Figure 2. RGA system used in irrigated breeding programme at IRRI. (a) seeding (b) seedling stage (c) vegetative stage (d) flowering stage (e) glasshouse set-up (f) showing tillering (g) showing panicles (h) harvesting stage with inset showing harvested panicles (i) inside view of screenhouse (CS-08B).

Figure 2. RGA system used in irrigated breeding programme at IRRI. (a) seeding (b) seedling stage (c) vegetative stage (d) flowering stage (e) glasshouse set-up (f) showing tillering (g) showing panicles (h) harvesting stage with inset showing harvested panicles (i) inside view of screenhouse (CS-08B).

Figure 3. Field RGA system piloted at IRRI. (a) initial seeding (b) seedling stage (c) vegetative stage resembling seedling nurseries (d) booting stage (e) harvesting mature plants (f) harvesting in the field.

Figure 3. Field RGA system piloted at IRRI. (a) initial seeding (b) seedling stage (c) vegetative stage resembling seedling nurseries (d) booting stage (e) harvesting mature plants (f) harvesting in the field.

Figure 4. Photos of field RGA implemented at BRRI. (a) An F3:4 generation is grown under FRGA conditions at BRRI Farm, Gazipur, 2017. (b) F2 generation with >3000 plants grown under FRGA conditions at BRRI Farm, Gazipur, 2017.

Figure 4. Photos of field RGA implemented at BRRI. (a) An F3:4 generation is grown under FRGA conditions at BRRI Farm, Gazipur, 2017. (b) F2 generation with >3000 plants grown under FRGA conditions at BRRI Farm, Gazipur, 2017.

Figure 5. Histograms of yield and flowering time for 3 different RGA populations evaluated in the 2015 dry season OYT. IR98492: yield (a), flowering time (b). IR98590: yield (c), flowering time (d). IR96915: yield (e), flowering time (f). Means of parents and IRRI154 check variety are indicated by arrows.

Figure 5. Histograms of yield and flowering time for 3 different RGA populations evaluated in the 2015 dry season OYT. IR98492: yield (a), flowering time (b). IR98590: yield (c), flowering time (d). IR96915: yield (e), flowering time (f). Means of parents and IRRI154 check variety are indicated by arrows.

Table 2. Performance of selected RGA lines in 2015 DS OYT and 2015 WS PYT. (a) RGA lines tested in group 1 (early/medium maturity) of the PYT (2015 WS) sorted by yield performance.

Figure 6. Histograms of yield for RGA and pedigree lines from population IR97367 evaluated in the 2015 dry season OYT. (a) RGA lines. (b) pedigree lines (from the same cross). Means of parents and IRRI154 check variety are indicated by arrows.

Figure 6. Histograms of yield for RGA and pedigree lines from population IR97367 evaluated in the 2015 dry season OYT. (a) RGA lines. (b) pedigree lines (from the same cross). Means of parents and IRRI154 check variety are indicated by arrows.

Table 3. Operational and investment costs for the RGA and pedigree method.

Table 4. Measures of project value for RGA.

Supplemental material

TPPS_1391705_Supplementary_material.doc

Download MS Word (451.5 KB)