Figures & data
![](/cms/asset/567d8923-baa4-4b2f-8bae-fb03ee4c357a/tpps_a_1698969_uf0001_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Influence of the water deficit on grain yield and yield components in four millet species.
Figure 1. Relationships between grain yield and yield components in four millet species.
** and * indicate significant correlations at 1 and 5%, respectively. NS, no significant correlation.
![Figure 1. Relationships between grain yield and yield components in four millet species.** and * indicate significant correlations at 1 and 5%, respectively. NS, no significant correlation.](/cms/asset/56e27a44-fc84-496c-87e7-10680362cd35/tpps_a_1698969_f0001_b.gif)
Table 2. Effects of the dehydration treatment on leaf water potential (ΨL), leaf osmotic potential (πL) at full turgor, and leaf osmotic adjustment (OA) at 20 d after the initiation of the drought treatment.
Table 3. Influence of the dehydration treatment on transpiration, water use efficiency (WUE) and yield WUE in four millet species.
Table 4. Influence of the dehydration treatment on the NSC content of the stem, including leaf sheath, the increase in total dry weight (ΔTDW), the increase in the panicle dry weight (ΔP), the dry matter partitioning ratio (DMPR) in four millet species.