Figures & data
![](/cms/asset/b00d62eb-1509-4d2e-8132-2cd07be5499b/tabe_a_1782211_uf0001_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Geometric properties of the SRC columns and tested material properties
Figure 1. Increased concrete strength at the maximum load limit state (cross-shaped steel cores). (a) Strains, stresses, and corresponding force components for the column with 40% of axial load column capacity tested by (Chen and Lin Citation2006) at the maximum limit state; confinement was provided by cross-shaped steel cores with a hoop spacing of 75 mm. (b) Confined stress–strain relationships for the concrete represented by the equivalent confining factors (based on the confined Mander approach)
![Figure 1. Increased concrete strength at the maximum load limit state (cross-shaped steel cores). (a) Strains, stresses, and corresponding force components for the column with 40% of axial load column capacity tested by (Chen and Lin Citation2006) at the maximum limit state; confinement was provided by cross-shaped steel cores with a hoop spacing of 75 mm. (b) Confined stress–strain relationships for the concrete represented by the equivalent confining factors (based on the confined Mander approach)](/cms/asset/31574a01-a382-4e34-a4f9-3813f94f3fc0/tabe_a_1782211_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Flowchart used to calculate nominal flexural moment capacity. (a) Process of finding nominal moment of the steel-concrete section. (b) Computing algorithm and analytical equations used to calculate nominal flexural moment capacity (Nguyen and Hong Citation2020)
![Figure 2. Flowchart used to calculate nominal flexural moment capacity. (a) Process of finding nominal moment of the steel-concrete section. (b) Computing algorithm and analytical equations used to calculate nominal flexural moment capacity (Nguyen and Hong Citation2020)](/cms/asset/14c0f709-2c66-4cdc-b487-eee056e5e38d/tabe_a_1782211_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Composite concrete column encasing steel sections with cross- shape (Chen and Lin Citation2006)
![Figure 3. Composite concrete column encasing steel sections with cross- shape (Chen and Lin Citation2006)](/cms/asset/6cd2aa6c-845d-41d5-a809-c5e9b8ec07ac/tabe_a_1782211_f0003_b.gif)
Figure 4. Verification analysis with cross-shaped steels; axial load-strain relationships for concrete with a hoop spacing of 140 mm (SRC4, 29.8 MPa), 75 mm (SRC5, 29.8 MPa), and 35 mm (SRC6, 29.5 MPa) (Chen and Lin Citation2006)
![Figure 4. Verification analysis with cross-shaped steels; axial load-strain relationships for concrete with a hoop spacing of 140 mm (SRC4, 29.8 MPa), 75 mm (SRC5, 29.8 MPa), and 35 mm (SRC6, 29.5 MPa) (Chen and Lin Citation2006)](/cms/asset/6fee0255-a173-46e6-93a0-41783910abf5/tabe_a_1782211_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. P-M diagrams for the strain evolutions (equivalent confining factors) with a hoop spacing of 75 mm, EL-PL for the rebar and steel (except EL-buckling for rebar in compression); the columns with a compressive strength of 29.8 MPa were tested by (Chen and Lin Citation2006) (SRC5). (a) P-M diagrams for the concrete with a hoop spacing of 75 mm for the concrete strains between 0.001 and 0.01. (b) Concrete strain of 0.003. (c) Concrete strain of 0.01
![Figure 5. P-M diagrams for the strain evolutions (equivalent confining factors) with a hoop spacing of 75 mm, EL-PL for the rebar and steel (except EL-buckling for rebar in compression); the columns with a compressive strength of 29.8 MPa were tested by (Chen and Lin Citation2006) (SRC5). (a) P-M diagrams for the concrete with a hoop spacing of 75 mm for the concrete strains between 0.001 and 0.01. (b) Concrete strain of 0.003. (c) Concrete strain of 0.01](/cms/asset/6a4eb840-c791-41b7-9c23-35f2abfb9d0b/tabe_a_1782211_f0005_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Flexural capacities of the columns tested by (Chen and Lin Citation2006) at the maximum and design load limit states (εc = 0.003) with a 60% axial load column capacity, Ke; 1.20 (140 mm, 29.8 MPa); 1.35 (75 mm, 29.8 MPa), and 1.55 (35 mm, 29.5 MPa)
Figure 6. P-M diagrams for the strain evolution (equivalent confining factors) with a hoop spacing of 75 mm (SRC5), EL-PL for both rebar and steel; columns with a compressive strength of 29.8 MPa, Chen and Lin’s column (SRC5) (Chen and Lin Citation2006). (a) P-M diagrams for concrete with a hoop spacing of 75 mm for the concrete strain between 0.001 and 0.01. (b) Concrete strain of 0.003. (c) Concrete strain of 0.01
![Figure 6. P-M diagrams for the strain evolution (equivalent confining factors) with a hoop spacing of 75 mm (SRC5), EL-PL for both rebar and steel; columns with a compressive strength of 29.8 MPa, Chen and Lin’s column (SRC5) (Chen and Lin Citation2006). (a) P-M diagrams for concrete with a hoop spacing of 75 mm for the concrete strain between 0.001 and 0.01. (b) Concrete strain of 0.003. (c) Concrete strain of 0.01](/cms/asset/15393181-7129-4cac-8940-c9da57f4d36b/tabe_a_1782211_f0006_oc.jpg)
Figure 7. Three-dimensional fracture surface of SRC5 (rebars with elasto-bucking). (a) Three-dimensional P-M diagrams (surface view). (d) Three-dimensional P-M diagrams (axial load vs. moment)
![Figure 7. Three-dimensional fracture surface of SRC5 (rebars with elasto-bucking). (a) Three-dimensional P-M diagrams (surface view). (d) Three-dimensional P-M diagrams (axial load vs. moment)](/cms/asset/6283a956-beda-4a14-91e4-05380c193051/tabe_a_1782211_f0007_oc.jpg)