Figures & data
![](/cms/asset/4555056b-5837-4c90-abae-fe680308f2c7/tabe_a_2085720_uf0001_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Nomenclature of design parameters.
Table 2. Design criteria for a design of ductile RC beams according to ACI 318–19 (Citation2019).
Table 3. Unit cost of reinforcement and concrete based on Korean unit (Hong et al. Citation2010).
Figure 2. AI-based Lagrange optimization algorithm of five steps based on unified functions of objectives (UFO).
![Figure 2. AI-based Lagrange optimization algorithm of five steps based on unified functions of objectives (UFO).](/cms/asset/0845b95b-eb7a-4239-ae11-22916b640136/tabe_a_2085720_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 4. Optimization design scenario of a doubly RC beam.
Table 5. Design range to generate 100,000 data used for training ANNs.
Table 6. 100,000 datasets to train ANNs.
Table 7. Training accuracies obtained based on three, four, and five hidden layers, each of which contains 30, 40, and 50 neurons.
Table 8. Formulation of equality and inequality constraints.
Table 9. Optimized single-objective functions.
Table 10. Equally spaced fractions generated based on MATLAB function, .
Table 11. Optimized design parameters on a Pareto frontier illustrated in .
Table 12. Design option with tradeoff ratios for an example shown in .
Table 13. Design parameters of two designs marked in blue color in .