863
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

ANN-based optimized design of doubly reinforced rectangular concrete beams based on multi-objective functions

&
Pages 1413-1429 | Received 07 Jan 2022, Accepted 27 May 2022, Published online: 16 Jun 2022

Figures & data

Table 1. Nomenclature of design parameters.

Table 2. Design criteria for a design of ductile RC beams according to ACI 318–19 (Citation2019).

Figure 1. Configuration of a doubly RC beam.

Figure 1. Configuration of a doubly RC beam.

Table 3. Unit cost of reinforcement and concrete based on Korean unit (Hong et al. Citation2010).

Figure 2. AI-based Lagrange optimization algorithm of five steps based on unified functions of objectives (UFO).

Figure 2. AI-based Lagrange optimization algorithm of five steps based on unified functions of objectives (UFO).

Table 4. Optimization design scenario of a doubly RC beam.

Figure 3. A topology of an ANN for a design of doubly RC beams.

Figure 3. A topology of an ANN for a design of doubly RC beams.

Figure 4. Flow of optimized designs based on AI-based Lagrange optimization algorithm.

Figure 4. Flow of optimized designs based on AI-based Lagrange optimization algorithm.

Table 5. Design range to generate 100,000 data used for training ANNs.

Table 6. 100,000 datasets to train ANNs.

Table 7. Training accuracies obtained based on three, four, and five hidden layers, each of which contains 30, 40, and 50 neurons.

Table 8. Formulation of equality and inequality constraints.

Table 9. Optimized single-objective functions.

Table 10. Equally spaced fractions generated based on MATLAB function, linspace.

Figure 5. Equally spaced fractions generated based on MATLAB function.

Figure 5. Equally spaced fractions generated based on MATLAB function.

Table 11. Optimized design parameters on a Pareto frontier illustrated in .

Figure 6. A Pareto frontier based on 361 fractions for RC beams based on three objective functions.

Figure 6. A Pareto frontier based on 361 fractions for RC beams based on three objective functions.

Figure 7. Verification of a Pareto frontier by 1 million structural datasets.

Figure 7. Verification of a Pareto frontier by 1 million structural datasets.

Table 12. Design option with tradeoff ratios for an example shown in .

Table 13. Design parameters of two designs marked in blue color in .

Figure 8. Estimated design ranges for minimized CO2 and BW corresponding to a defined cost budget.

Figure 8. Estimated design ranges for minimized CO2 and BW corresponding to a defined cost budget.