1,519
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Theme I: Effects of reciprocity on attention, motor actions, and memory

The influence of social and emotional context on the gaze leading orienting effect

, , &
Pages 54-69 | Received 28 Jan 2021, Accepted 08 Sep 2021, Published online: 04 Oct 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Panel A: Example timecourse of displays presented in a single trial, progressing from left to right. The faces are examples of “low dominance” stimuli used in Experiments 1–3, and the example trial represents a congruent “joint attention” condition because the target appears on the face that followed the participant’s eyes to the object. Panel B: The left image illustrates an example of high physical-dominance faces and a threat related object, and the right image contains examples of the faces from Experiment 4.

Figure 1. Panel A: Example timecourse of displays presented in a single trial, progressing from left to right. The faces are examples of “low dominance” stimuli used in Experiments 1–3, and the example trial represents a congruent “joint attention” condition because the target appears on the face that followed the participant’s eyes to the object. Panel B: The left image illustrates an example of high physical-dominance faces and a threat related object, and the right image contains examples of the faces from Experiment 4.

Figure 2. Mean reaction times (ms) in each condition in Experiment 1. Error bars are within-subjects standard error for the 3-way interaction term (Loftus & Masson, Citation1994).

Figure 2. Mean reaction times (ms) in each condition in Experiment 1. Error bars are within-subjects standard error for the 3-way interaction term (Loftus & Masson, Citation1994).

Figure 3. Mean reaction times (ms) for each condition in Experiment 2. Error bars represent within-subjects standard error of the interaction term.

Figure 3. Mean reaction times (ms) for each condition in Experiment 2. Error bars represent within-subjects standard error of the interaction term.

Figure 4. Mean reaction times (ms) for each condition in Experiment 3. Error bars represent within-subjects standard error of the interaction term.

Figure 4. Mean reaction times (ms) for each condition in Experiment 3. Error bars represent within-subjects standard error of the interaction term.

Figure 5. Mean reaction times (ms) for each condition in Experiment 4. Error bars represent within-subjects standard error of the interaction term.

Figure 5. Mean reaction times (ms) for each condition in Experiment 4. Error bars represent within-subjects standard error of the interaction term.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (9.3 KB)