![Sample our Humanities journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5939/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Humanities.jpg"})
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes
1. White, The Practical Past, 47–8.
2. In addition, as Spiegel notes in her essay on his work, rupture and discontinuity have long been central, if somewhat paradoxically rooted, in White's thinking about history. Spiegel notes that in his earlier essays, White argued that his analysis of the tropes of the historical genre was meant to allow historians to embrace the essential discontinuity of the human condition, even while retaining a sense of “progress” in historical understanding. CitationSpiegel, “Above, About and Beyond the Writing of History,” 497, 501.
3. At the end of The Practical Past, White questions the possibility of a continuity in both substance and appearance (101), but recaptures it through the notion of “practice” (102). It is also in this sense that I understand the idea of continuity (and as a consequence of disruption) – as performative reiterations, echoes, re-enactions by actors conscious of a past. On this understanding of continuity and change see CitationSewell, Logics of History.
4. White, The Practical Past, 62.
5. CitationGuldi and Armitage, The History Manifesto, 11–12.
6. In the interests of full disclosure, and self-promotion, these ideas are at the heart of a volume I recently co-edited: CitationTaithe and Pinto, The Impact of History?
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Pedro Ramos Pinto
Pedro Ramos Pinto is Lecturer in International Economic History at the University of Cambridge, and a fellow of Trinity Hall.