Figures & data
Table 1. Factors, treatments and As and F concentrations.
Table 2. Determination of TBARS on soybean roots and leaves treated with low, medium and high As and/or F concentration with both P conditions.
Figure 1. Chlorophyll content on soybean leaves treatment with low, medium and high As and/or F concentration with both P conditions. Experiments were carried out as described in the ‘Materials and methods’ section. Data are mean values of three independent experiments ± S.E. Each value represents three replicates. Different lowercase letters within columns indicate significant differences with respect to controls (p < 0.05). Different capital letters within rows indicate significant differences between roots or leaves in Soil P+ and Soil P−(p < 0.05), according to the Tukey’s multiple range test.
![Figure 1. Chlorophyll content on soybean leaves treatment with low, medium and high As and/or F concentration with both P conditions. Experiments were carried out as described in the ‘Materials and methods’ section. Data are mean values of three independent experiments ± S.E. Each value represents three replicates. Different lowercase letters within columns indicate significant differences with respect to controls (p < 0.05). Different capital letters within rows indicate significant differences between roots or leaves in Soil P+ and Soil P−(p < 0.05), according to the Tukey’s multiple range test.](/cms/asset/d18b85f5-0ccf-4282-9fee-f206b33c9cf3/yrer_a_1276253_f0001_b.gif)
Table 3. Glutathione content on soybean leaves treated with low, medium and high As and/or F concentration with both P conditions.
Figure 2. Determination of CAT activity on soybean roots and leaves’ treatment with low, medium and high As and/or F concentration with both P conditions. Experiments were carried out as described in the ‘Materials and methods’ section. Data are mean values of three independent experiments ± S.E. Each value represents three replicates. Different lowercase letters within columns indicate significant differences with respect to controls (p < 0.05). Different capital letters within rows indicate significant differences between roots or leaves in Soil P+ and Soil P−(p < 0.05), according to the Tukey’s multiple range test.
![Figure 2. Determination of CAT activity on soybean roots and leaves’ treatment with low, medium and high As and/or F concentration with both P conditions. Experiments were carried out as described in the ‘Materials and methods’ section. Data are mean values of three independent experiments ± S.E. Each value represents three replicates. Different lowercase letters within columns indicate significant differences with respect to controls (p < 0.05). Different capital letters within rows indicate significant differences between roots or leaves in Soil P+ and Soil P−(p < 0.05), according to the Tukey’s multiple range test.](/cms/asset/1f1175c2-3a56-4329-b174-1a06579635fd/yrer_a_1276253_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. Determination of SOD activity on soybean roots and leaves’ treatment with low, medium and high As and/or F concentration with both P conditions. Experiments were carried out as described in the ‘Materials and methods’ section. Data are mean values of three independent experiments ± S.E. Each value represents three replicates. Different lowercase letters within columns indicate significant differences with respect to controls (p < 0.05). Different capital letters within rows indicate significant differences between roots or leaves in Soil P+ and Soil P−(p < 0.05), according to the Tukey’s multiple range test.
![Figure 3. Determination of SOD activity on soybean roots and leaves’ treatment with low, medium and high As and/or F concentration with both P conditions. Experiments were carried out as described in the ‘Materials and methods’ section. Data are mean values of three independent experiments ± S.E. Each value represents three replicates. Different lowercase letters within columns indicate significant differences with respect to controls (p < 0.05). Different capital letters within rows indicate significant differences between roots or leaves in Soil P+ and Soil P−(p < 0.05), according to the Tukey’s multiple range test.](/cms/asset/8daace64-3cdc-4571-896b-77c0e608a711/yrer_a_1276253_f0003_b.gif)
Figure 4. Determination of GPOX activity on soybean roots and leaves’ treatment with low, medium and high As and/or F concentration with both P conditions. Experiments were carried out as described in the ‘Materials and methods’ section. Data are mean values of three independent experiments ± S.E. Each value represents three replicates. Different lowercase letters within columns indicate significant differences with respect to controls (p < 0.05). Different capital letters within rows indicate significant differences between roots or leaves in Soil P+ and Soil P−(p < 0.05), according to the Tukey’s multiple range test.
![Figure 4. Determination of GPOX activity on soybean roots and leaves’ treatment with low, medium and high As and/or F concentration with both P conditions. Experiments were carried out as described in the ‘Materials and methods’ section. Data are mean values of three independent experiments ± S.E. Each value represents three replicates. Different lowercase letters within columns indicate significant differences with respect to controls (p < 0.05). Different capital letters within rows indicate significant differences between roots or leaves in Soil P+ and Soil P−(p < 0.05), according to the Tukey’s multiple range test.](/cms/asset/bc547976-19b0-48bb-abc4-0dc28b9aaa17/yrer_a_1276253_f0004_b.gif)