Publication Cover
Redox Report
Communications in Free Radical Research
Volume 22, 2017 - Issue 6
2,360
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Vitamin C and Trolox decrease oxidative stress and hemolysis in cold-stored human red blood cells

, , &

Figures & data

Figure 1. The effects of the RBC storage in the presence of vitC (a) or vitC and Trolox (b) on the degree of hemolysis. The results shown are means ± SD of eight independent experiments (n = 8), where n means number of donors; *p < .05 in the presence of antioxidant (antioxidants) at any given day of storage versus in the absence of antioxidants (control) at the appropriate day of storage. The significance of differences between the mean values of various parameters were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction (Bonferroni post hoc test) (a). The differences between the groups (the mean values of SA (25 μM), Trolox (125 μM) and the combination of SA/Trolox samples) were analyzed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test (b).

Figure 1. The effects of the RBC storage in the presence of vitC (a) or vitC and Trolox (b) on the degree of hemolysis. The results shown are means ± SD of eight independent experiments (n = 8), where n means number of donors; *p < .05 in the presence of antioxidant (antioxidants) at any given day of storage versus in the absence of antioxidants (control) at the appropriate day of storage. The significance of differences between the mean values of various parameters were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction (Bonferroni post hoc test) (a). The differences between the groups (the mean values of SA (25 μM), Trolox (125 μM) and the combination of SA/Trolox samples) were analyzed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test (b).

Figure 2. The effects of the RBC storage in the presence of vitC (a) or vitC and Trolox (b) on the extracellular LDH activity. The results shown are means ± SD of eight independent experiments (n = 8), where n means number of donors; *p < .05 in the presence of antioxidant (antioxidants) at any given day of storage versus in the absence of antioxidants (control) at the appropriate day of storage. The significance of differences between the mean values of various parameters were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc test (a). The differences between the groups (the mean values of SA (25 μM), Trolox (125 μM) and the combination of SA/Trolox samples) were analyzed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test (b).

Figure 2. The effects of the RBC storage in the presence of vitC (a) or vitC and Trolox (b) on the extracellular LDH activity. The results shown are means ± SD of eight independent experiments (n = 8), where n means number of donors; *p < .05 in the presence of antioxidant (antioxidants) at any given day of storage versus in the absence of antioxidants (control) at the appropriate day of storage. The significance of differences between the mean values of various parameters were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc test (a). The differences between the groups (the mean values of SA (25 μM), Trolox (125 μM) and the combination of SA/Trolox samples) were analyzed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test (b).

Figure 3. The effects of the RBC storage in the presence of vitC (a) or vitC and Trolox (b) on the TBARS concentration. The results shown are means ± SD of eight independent experiments (n = 8) where n means number of donors; *p < .05 in the presence of antioxidant (antioxidants) at any given day of storage versus in the absence of antioxidants (control) at the appropriate day of storage. The significance of differences between the mean values of various parameters were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc test (a). The differences between the groups (the mean values of SA (25 μM), Trolox (125 μM) and the combination of SA/Trolox samples) were analyzed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test (b).

Figure 3. The effects of the RBC storage in the presence of vitC (a) or vitC and Trolox (b) on the TBARS concentration. The results shown are means ± SD of eight independent experiments (n = 8) where n means number of donors; *p < .05 in the presence of antioxidant (antioxidants) at any given day of storage versus in the absence of antioxidants (control) at the appropriate day of storage. The significance of differences between the mean values of various parameters were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc test (a). The differences between the groups (the mean values of SA (25 μM), Trolox (125 μM) and the combination of SA/Trolox samples) were analyzed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test (b).

Figure 4. The effects of the RBC storage in the presence of vitC and Trolox on the GSH depletion. The results shown are means ± SD of eight independent experiments (n = 8), where n means number of donors; **p < .01 in the presence of antioxidants at day 20 versus in the absence of antioxidants (control) at the 20 day of storage. The differences between the groups (the mean values of SA (25 μM), Trolox (125 μM) and the combination of SA/Trolox samples) were analyzed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test.

Figure 4. The effects of the RBC storage in the presence of vitC and Trolox on the GSH depletion. The results shown are means ± SD of eight independent experiments (n = 8), where n means number of donors; **p < .01 in the presence of antioxidants at day 20 versus in the absence of antioxidants (control) at the 20 day of storage. The differences between the groups (the mean values of SA (25 μM), Trolox (125 μM) and the combination of SA/Trolox samples) were analyzed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test.

Figure 5. The effects of the RBC storage in the presence of vitC (a) or vitC and Trolox (b) on TAC in the supernatant. The results shown are means ± SD of eight independent experiments (n = 8), where n means number of donors; *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001 in the presence of antioxidant (antioxidants) at any given day of storage versus in the absence of antioxidants (control) at the appropriate day of storage. The significance of differences between the mean values of various parameters were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test (a). The differences between the groups (the mean values of SA (25 μM), Trolox (125 μM) and the combination of SA/Trolox samples) were analyzed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test (b).

Figure 5. The effects of the RBC storage in the presence of vitC (a) or vitC and Trolox (b) on TAC in the supernatant. The results shown are means ± SD of eight independent experiments (n = 8), where n means number of donors; *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001 in the presence of antioxidant (antioxidants) at any given day of storage versus in the absence of antioxidants (control) at the appropriate day of storage. The significance of differences between the mean values of various parameters were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test (a). The differences between the groups (the mean values of SA (25 μM), Trolox (125 μM) and the combination of SA/Trolox samples) were analyzed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test (b).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.