2,783
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

The legislature and agenda politics of social welfare: a comparative analysis of authoritarian and democratic regimes in South Korea

Pages 1235-1255 | Received 25 Nov 2018, Accepted 18 May 2019, Published online: 12 Jun 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. Change of Democracy and Legislative Independence Levels in Korea. Source: Polyarchy and Legislative Constraints indicators by Varieties of Democracy.

Figure 1. Change of Democracy and Legislative Independence Levels in Korea. Source: Polyarchy and Legislative Constraints indicators by Varieties of Democracy.

Table 1. Categories of formal social welfare.

Table 2. Logistic regression results by all political actors.

Figure 2. Marginal effect of democratic levels on social welfare bills (left: continuous scale; right: dichotomous scale).

Figure 2. Marginal effect of democratic levels on social welfare bills (left: continuous scale; right: dichotomous scale).

Table 3. Different targets of social welfare bills by regime type.

Figure 3. Welfare bill contribution by actor.

Figure 3. Welfare bill contribution by actor.

Figure 4. Marginal effect of democratic levels on social welfare bills by sponsoring entity (left: social welfare or others; right: universal or particularistic welfare).

Figure 4. Marginal effect of democratic levels on social welfare bills by sponsoring entity (left: social welfare or others; right: universal or particularistic welfare).

Table 4. Logistic regression results by legislators.

Figure 5. Marginal effect of democratic levels on social welfare bills by legislators' attributes (left: gender; right: party status; bottom: elected tier).

Figure 5. Marginal effect of democratic levels on social welfare bills by legislators' attributes (left: gender; right: party status; bottom: elected tier).
Supplemental material

Supplementary_document__20190404_.docx

Download MS Word (26.5 KB)