Mapping the research on gender, LGBTQI minorities and heritage across social sciences and humanities

Figures & data

Table 1. Top 15 WOS categories to which the articles on gender and heritage are ascribed.

Nr	WOS Categories	Record Count	% of 427
1	Humanities Multidisciplinary	62	14.5
2	Hospitality, Leisure, Sport, Tourism	51	11.9
3	History	33	7.7
4	Women’s Studies	26	6.1
5	Social Sciences Interdisciplinary	23	5.2
6	Sociology	22	5.2
7	Education, Educational Research	20	4.7
8	Green Sustainable Science, Technology	20	4.7
9	Environmental Sciences	19	4.5
10	Environmental Studies	19	4.5
11	Anthropology	18	4.2
12	Cultural Studies	18	4.2
13	Archaeology	17	4.0
14	Area Studies	16	3.7
15	Art	16	3.7

Figure 1. The evolution of articles on gender and heritage by year.

Table 2. Top countries producing scholarly articles on gender and heritage.

Nr	Countries	Record Count	% of 427
1	USA	89	20.8
2	Spain	58	13.6
3	England	54	12.7
4	Australia	26	6.1
5	Peoples Republic of China	25	5.9
6	Italy	19	4.5
7	France	15	3.5
8	South Africa	14	3.3
9	Canada	12	2.8
10	Sweden	12	2.8

Table 3. Most productive institutions publishing articles on gender and heritage.

Nr	Affiliations	Record Count	% of 427
1	Stockholm University, Sweden	6	1.4
2	University of London, England	6	1.4
3	Complutense University of Madrid, Spain	5	1.2
4	State University System of Florida, USA	5	1.2
5	UDICE French Research Universities, France	5	1.2
6	University of Córdoba, Spain	4	0.9
7	Universidad de Extremadura, Spain	4	0.9
8	University of California, USA	4	0.9
9	University of Johannesburg, South Africa	4	0.9
10	University of Oviedo, Spain	4	0.9
11	University of South Africa, South Africa	4	0.9
12	Utrecht University, The Netherlands	4	0.9

Figure 2. The evolution of articles on gender and heritage by Western and non-Western corresponding authors.

Table 4. The five most cited articles on gender and heritage.

Nr	Article	Times cited in WOS
1	Kim, Yeong Gug; Eves, Anita; Scarles, Caroline (2009) Building a model of local food consumption on trips and holidays: A grounded theory approach. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT	348
2	Guerrero, Luis; Claret, Anna; Verbeke, Wim; Enderli, Geraldine; Zakowska-Biemans, Sylwia; Vanhonacker, Filiep; Issanchou, Sylvie; Sajdakowska, Marta; Granli, Britt Signe; Scalvedi, Luisa; Contel, Michele; Hersleth, Margrethe (2010) Perception of traditional food products in six European regions using free word association. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE	249
3	Waitt, G (2000) Consuming heritage: Perceived historical authenticity. ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH	247
4	Dieck, M. Claudia Tom; Jung, Timothy (2018) A theoretical model of mobile augmented reality acceptance in urban heritage tourism. CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM	186
5	Muler Gonzalez, Vanessa; Coromina, Lluis; Gali, Nuria (2018) Overtourism: Residents’ perceptions of tourism impact as an indicator of resident social carrying capacity – case study of a Spanish heritage town. TOURISM REVIEW	139

Table 5. Gender focus of the articles on gender and heritage by authorship pattern.

			Authors’ gender			Total
			Male	Female	M&F
Gender focus of the study	Male	Count	8	10	3	21
		Expected Count	4.1	11.1	5.7	21.0
		% within Gender focus of the study	38.1%	47.6%	14.3%	100.0%
		% within Authors’ gender	9.5%	4.4%	2.6%	4.9%
		Std. Residual	1.9	−.3	−1.1
	Female	Count	24	128	27	179
		Expected Count	35.3	95.0	48.7	179.0
		% within Gender focus of the study	13.4%	71.5%	15.1%	100.0%
		% within Authors’ gender	28.6%	56.6%	23.3%	42.0%
		Std. Residual	−1.9	3.4	−3.1
	Male & Female	Count	52	88	86	226
		Expected Count	44.6	119.9	61.5	226.0
		% within Gender focus of the study	23.0%	38.9%	38.1%	100.0%
		% within Authors’ gender	61.9%	38.9%	74.1%	53.1%
		Std. Residual	1.1	−2.9	3.1
Total		Count	84	226	116	426
		Expected Count	84.0	226.0	116.0	426.0
		% within Gender focus of the study	19.7%	53.1%	27.2%	100.0%
		% within Authors’ gender	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%

Table 6. Gender focus of the articles on gender and heritage depending on the number of authors.

			Gender focus of the study			Total
			Male	Female	M&F
No of authors	One author	Count	15	116	84	215
		Expected Count	10.6	90.6	113.8	215.0
		% within No of authors	7.0%	54.0%	39.1%	100.0%
		% within Gender focus of the study	71.4%	64.4%	37.2%	50.4%
		Std. Residual	1.4	2.7	−2.8
	Two authors	Count	4	41	47	92
		Expected Count	4.5	38.8	48.7	92.0
		% within No of authors	4.3%	44.6%	51.1%	100.0%
		% within Gender focus of the study	19.0%	22.8%	20.8%	21.5%
		Std. Residual	−.2	.4	−.2
	Three or more co-authors	Count	2	23	95	120
		Expected Count	5.9	50.6	63.5	120.0
		% within No of authors	1.7%	19.2%	79.2%	100.0%
		% within Gender focus of the study	9.5%	12.8%	42.0%	28.1%
		Std. Residual	−1.6	−3.9	4.0
Total		Count	21	180	226	427
		Expected Count	21.0	180.0	226.0	427.0
		% within No of authors	4.9%	42.2%	52.9%	100.0%
		% within Gender focus of the study	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%

Table 7. Most frequent words (with stemming and excluding common words) included in the lists of keywords by authors’ gender.

Nr	Most frequent words (N = 1635) included in keywords by female authors	Most frequent words (N = 666) included in keywords by male authors
1	Heritage (98)	Heritage (29)
2	Gender (84)	Culture (23)
3	Culture (41)	Tourism (19)
4	Feminism (38)	Gender (17)
5	Women (36)	Nation (9)
6	Tourism (25)	Sustainable (6)
7	History (23)	Knowledge (6)
8	Museum (15)	World (6)
9	Education (14)	Masculine (6)
10	Memory (14)	Tradition (5)

Kim, Y. G., A. Eves, and C. Scarles. 2009. “Building a Model of Local Food Consumption on Trips and Holidays: A Grounded Theory Approach.” International Journal of Hospitality Management 28 (3): 423–431.

 Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Guerrero, L., A. Claret, W. Verbeke, G. Enderli, S. Zakowska-Biemans, F. Vanhonacker, S. Issanchou, et al. 2010. “Perception of Traditional Food Products in Six European Regions Using Free Word Association.” Food Quality and Preference 21 (2): 225–233.

 Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Waitt, G. 2000. “Consuming Heritage: Perceived Historical Authenticity.” Annals of Tourism Research 27 (4): 835–862.

 Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Dieck, M. C. T., and T. Jung. 2018. “A Theoretical Model of Mobile Augmented Reality Acceptance in Urban Heritage Tourism.” Current Issues in Tourism 21 (2): 154–175.

 Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Muler Gonzalez, V., L. Coromina, and N. Gali. 2018. “Overturism: Residents' Perceptions of Tourism Impact as an Indicator of Resident Social Carrying Capacity - Case Study of a Spanish Heritage Town.” Tourism Review 73 (3): 277–296.

 Web of Science ®Google Scholar