Engagement for quality development in higher education: a process for quality assurance of assessment

Figures & data

Figure 1. The five phases of the process for quality assurance of assessment.

Table 1. Excerpt of results of the survey

	P1				P2				P3				Total
	Teachers		Students		Teachers		Students		Teachers		Students		Teachers		Students
Excerpt from results of survey	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD
Reproducibility	55	34			65	22			72	24			64	28
The same learning outcome is assessed in multiple ways	75	28			66	19			80	21			74	23
Assessment by multiple assessors	50	37			74	28			65	28			63	32
Transparency	84	21	–		89	15	82	21	93	12	84	22	88	17	83	21
Students are informed of learning outcomes	88	21	–		91	16	86	16	98	7	87	22	92	16	86	18
Students are informed of assessment criteria	80	21	–		86	15	78	24	88	15	82	23	84	17	79	23
Acceptance	67	30	–		49	31	63	24	72	27	62	27	67	27	63	25
Students accept the assessment criteria	78	27	–		77	14	81	15	93	15	87	14	83	20	83	15
Students accept the assessment methods	85	14	–		80	12	61	24	80	15	78	12	82	13	67	22
Students participate in the development of assessment criteria	50	34	–		43	8	55	24	53	24	40	20	49	24	50	23

The same distinctions as in the Dutch study were followed for the evaluation of the results: low (0–35), medium (36–65) and high (66–100) scores. The medium and high scores are marked yellow (light highlight) and green (darker highlight) respectively (there were no low scores).