Figures & data
Figure 2. Examples of the perception task with four identical jars (left) and one problem task in the normal arrangement condition (right).
![Figure 2. Examples of the perception task with four identical jars (left) and one problem task in the normal arrangement condition (right).](/cms/asset/c196341d-ec2b-487c-b722-9486679181b5/ptar_a_1494630_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. Mean gaze distribution and SD (in per cent) for the perception tasks (left panel) and the first 10 s of problem solving (right panel).
![Figure 3. Mean gaze distribution and SD (in per cent) for the perception tasks (left panel) and the first 10 s of problem solving (right panel).](/cms/asset/66a8b869-724f-443b-8956-ba9fe05b2f7a/ptar_a_1494630_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4. Proportion for the correct solutions in the congruent (left) and incongruent (right) trials.
![Figure 4. Proportion for the correct solutions in the congruent (left) and incongruent (right) trials.](/cms/asset/a4000353-704e-4228-9c8a-6cd0acd68173/ptar_a_1494630_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5. Experimental setup for the second study with the two possible solutions (addition solution 12 + 12 + 97 = 121, subtraction solution 121-12-12 = 97).
![Figure 5. Experimental setup for the second study with the two possible solutions (addition solution 12 + 12 + 97 = 121, subtraction solution 121-12-12 = 97).](/cms/asset/5e0aea74-a212-49b6-a47f-731ddfa01602/ptar_a_1494630_f0005_b.jpg)