Publication Cover
Neurocase
Behavior, Cognition and Neuroscience
Volume 23, 2017 - Issue 3-4
179
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Fractionating controlled memory processes and recall of context in recognition memory: a case report

&
Pages 220-229 | Received 18 Oct 2016, Accepted 22 Aug 2017, Published online: 01 Sep 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Recollection has been described as both a recognition memory judgment requiring cognitive control and the ability to retrieve contextual information about a prior occurrence. At the core of this article is the question whether or not these two subcomponents of recollection are dissociable in amnesia. In three experiments, we explored the influence of exclusion task instructions on performance in a single case (CJ), with the view to understand the relative contributions of control and source memory to recognition memory decisions. First, contrasting findings were obtained between tasks requiring strategic control or source reports. Second, even though CJ displayed some residual source memory relative to the ability to strategically control this information, his source memory capacity was time-limited. Our findings resonate with the novel proposal that recollection draws heavily upon working memory resources, and provide an example of how amnesic patients might utilize residual working memory capacity to solve episodic memory tasks.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the time given by CJ and his parents to take part in this research. We also thank Dr Eddy Estlin for his help with describing the medical aspects of CJ’s condition. This data was collected whilst the first author was carrying out a PhD at the University of Leeds under the supervision of the second author. Preparation of this manuscript was facilitated by a British Psychological Society postdoctoral study visit scheme awarded to the first author.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. The disclosure statement has been inserted. Please correct if this is inaccurate.

Notes

1. In Experiments 2 and 3 we calculate exact probabilities of the responses made by CJ. The rationale for this analysis is that we calculate the probability that the pattern of responses could have occurred by chance. Like this, a value of .5 means that there is a high probability of receiving the same pattern by chance—i.e., we might imagine that the pattern we have found arrived by chance. At a value of p = .05, there is only a 5% chance that exactly the same pattern would be found by chance.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 439.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.