867
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Culturally competent interventions in Type 2 diabetes mellitus management: an equity-oriented literature review

&
Pages 579-600 | Received 08 Feb 2013, Accepted 16 Oct 2013, Published online: 22 Nov 2013
 

Abstract

Objectives. Although, culturally competent (CC) interventions aim to reduce health inequalities for ethnic minorities, they have been criticized on the grounds that they increase prejudice and stereotyping. It remains unclear whether CC interventions really can reduce health inequalities among ethnic minorities. The purpose of this review is to assess whether CC interventions in the management of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) match the recommendations to reduce health inequalities.

Design. We identified CC interventions relating to T2DM among ethnic minority patients in the literature published between 2005 and 2011. Data were analyzed according to an equity-oriented framework. Each study was given a score based on its congruence with the reduction of health inequalities amongst ethnic minorities.

Results. We reviewed 137 papers and found 61 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Most interventions focused on the individual level and the modification of patients' health behavior. Very few addressed the sociopolitical level. A minority of the studies acknowledged the role of socioeconomic deprivation in ethnic health inequalities. Half of the studies contained no information about the socioeconomic status of the patients. The patients receiving the interventions were socioeconomically deprived. Only 10 studies compared ethnic minority groups to majority groups. Thirty-three studies had a very low average congruence score. The highest score of congruence was achieved by one study.

Conclusion. Overall, CC interventions addressing T2DM are not congruent with the reduction of ethnic health inequalities. The future of CC interventions may involve going one step further and going back to basic tenets of cultural competence: the integration of difference, whatever its source, into the delivery of fair health care for patients.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to William D'Hoore for his contribution to the process of reviewing the papers selected for the literature review and to Isabelle Aujoulat for her comments on the manuscript. MD is a research fellow of the Belgian Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS. The authors declare that there are no competing interests. The authors would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their comments and support.

Notes

1. Supplementary Content may be viewed online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2013.857763.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 440.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.