Profiling development of burnout over eight years: relation with job demands and resources

Figures & data

Table 1. Enumeration of fit statistics for latent burnout profiles

Number of profiles	LL	FP	AIC	BIC	BLRT (p)	Entropy	Latent profile proportions %
1	−3045.2	135	6360.5	6783.0	-	-	100
2	−2997.8	151	6297.6	6770.3	.001	.990	89/11
3	−2953.6	167	6241.3	6764.0	.001	.985	78/12/10
4	−2920.1	183	6206.3	6779.1	.001	.989	78/11/9/2

LL = log-likelihood; FP = free parameters; AIC = Akaike information criterion; BIC = Bayesian information criterion; BLRT = Bootstrapped likelihood ratio test.

Figure 1. Latent profiles of burnout development. The y axis refers to participants’ level of each of the burnout symptoms (1 = completely disagree, 6 = completely agree)

Table 2. Changes in job demands and resources according to the developmental profiles of burnout: GLM for repeated measures

Burnout Profiles	T1 M (S.E.)	T2 M (S.E.)	T3 M (S.E.)	T4 M (S.E.)	T5 M (S.E.)		Profile Effect F		Time Effect F	Profile × Time Effect F
		Job demands					5.13**		1.52 ns.	1.32 ns.
1. Stable, low burnout	3.06 (0.08)	3.02 (0.08)	3.02 (0.08)	2.88 (0.08)	2.68 (0.08)		< 2**
2. Ex instigated, increasing burnout	3.32 (0.22)	3.82 (0.23)	3.60 (0.22)	3.36 (0.22)	3.33 (0.22)		> 1**, 3**
3. Cy and rpe, inverted U-shaped burnout	3.10 (0.24)	3.01 (0.24)	2.94 (0.23)	3.01 (0.23)	3.02 (0.23)		< 2**
		Job control					4.79***		0.80 ns.	1.83 ns.
1. Stable, low burnout	4.04 (0.06)	4.04 (0.05)	4.07 (0.06)	4.11 (0.06)	4.11 (0.07)		> 3**
2. Ex instigated, increasing burnout	3.99 (0.15)	3.80 (0.14)	4.04 (0.15)	3.89 (0.17)	3.81 (0.17)
3. Cy and rpe, inverted U-shaped burnout	3.63 (0.16)	3.67 (0.14)	3.65 (0.16)	3.73 (0.18)	3.76 (0.18)		< 1**
	Supportive organizational climate						11.26***		4.81**	5.02***
1. Stable, low burnout	3.56 (0.07)	3.72 (0.07)	3.55 (0.07)	3.52 (0.08)	3.52 (0.07)		> 2**, 3***
2. Ex instigated, increasing burnout	3.50 (0.17)	3.00 (0.16)	3.25 (0.18)	2.88 (0.21)	2.88 (0.21)		< 1**
3. Cy and rpe, inverted U-shaped burnout	3.17 (0.18)	2.42 (0.18)	3.05 (0.20)	3.19 (0.23)	3.19 (0.23)		< 1***

Weekly working hours were controlled for. Pairwise comparisons made by Bonferroni post hoc tests. ** p <.01, *** p <.001.

Ex = exhaustion; cy = cynicism; rpe = reduced professional efficacy