ABSTRACT
Despite decades of efforts to promote social mobility, studying for higher education maintains or even exacerbates social inequalities. Interventions, including employability classes and careers advice and guidance, have not succeeded in ‘levelling the playing field’ for students. To understand why inequalities persist despite these efforts, it is important to understand how students from different backgrounds acquire and apply various forms of capital. The graduate capital model is used in this article to explore how five dimensions of capital (human, social, cultural, identity and psychological dimensions) interact, drawing on data from interviews with high and low socio-economic status (SES) university students. While in general lower-SES students found employability classes helpful in equipping them with the human capital required in order to succeed on today’s graduate labour market, in contrast to their high-SES peers they struggled to understand the importance of and mobilise this and other forms of capital promoted in those classes. The crucial forms of capital that seem to interact with all other capitals are social and psychological. Universities therefore need to find a way to help low-SES students build and apply these forms of capital and alleviate barriers to their mobilisation.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Violetta Parutis
Dr. Violetta Parutis is a Senior Survey Officer on Understanding Society: UK Household Longitudinal Study, and part of the research team on the Inequality in Higher Education Outcomes in the UK project (PI: Adeline Delavande) at the Institute for Social and Economic Research at the University of Essex.
Camille Kandiko Howson
Dr. Camille Kandiko Howson is Associate Professor of Education in the Centre for Higher Education Research & Scholarship at Imperial College London.