Do generic gTLDs require their own ex ante regulation?

Abstract

This article reviews ICANN's treatment of applications to create new Top Level Domains based on generic terms (e.g. .book, .motorcycles), reserved for exclusive use by the applicant. It finds little evidence in past domain name history that such registrations represented a risk to competition. Had applicants made abusive use of their domains then existing law would have provided appropriate remedies in any case. Theory suggests that such a novel market was unsuitable for prospective regulatory action and that, by converting potential monopolies into potential cartels, ICANN's action may even have made the competition risk worse.

Keywords:

• ICANN
• gTLDs
• competition law
• essential facilities

Notes

1 ICANN, ‘New gTLDs: About the Program’ <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/program> accessed 27 September 2014.

2 ICANN, ‘GAC Communique – Beijing, People's Republic of China’ (11 April 2013) <http://www.icann.org/en/news/correspondence/gac-to-board-18apr13-en.pdf> accessed 15 December 2015.

3 ICANN, ‘gTLD Applicant Guidebook’ (4 June 2012) <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb> accessed 15 December 2015.

4 ICANN, ‘GAC Communique – Beijing’ (note 2) 11.

5 Mueller, Milton.2013. ‘Who Needs the ITU When you have a GAC?’ (11 April 2013) <http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/11/who-needs-the-itu-when-you-have-a-gac/> accessed 15 December 2015.

6 Murphy, Kevin. 2013. ‘This is how Stupid the GAC's New gTLDs advice is’ (9 May 2013) <http://domainincite.com/12944-this-is-how-stupid-the-gacs-new-gtlds-advice-is> accessed 15 December 2015.

7 ICANN, ‘Bylaws for Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers’ (7 February 2014) Article XI <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/bylaws-2012-02-25-en> accessed 15 December 2015.

8 ICANN, ‘Top Level Domains (gTLDs)’ <http://archive.icann.org/en/tlds/> accessed 15 December 2015.

9 ICANN, ‘Generic Names Supporting Organisation Final Report: Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains' (8 August 2007) <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/pdp-dec05-fr-parta-08aug07.htm> accessed 15 December 2015.

10 ICANN, ‘gTLD Applicant Guidebook’ (note 3).

11 Seager, Jane.2013. ‘Domain Names: Community Service’ (13 December 2013) <http://www.scl.org/site.aspx?i=ed34579> accessed 15 December 2015.

12 ICANN, ‘GAC Communique – Beijing’ (note 2).

13 ICANN, ‘Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group Comments on the Beijing GAC Communiqué’ (14 May 2013) <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d6GT0zqLjU6e7Js-TE2Gjlm_-B5xvhE5CrRPZSV3oV4/> accessed 15 December 2015.

14 Mueller, M, ‘Who Needs the ITU’ (note 5).

15 Out-Law.com, ‘Government Plans to Restrict Exclusive Operation of “.cloud” Domain Backed by Cloud Industry Body’ (15 April 2013) <http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/april/government-plans-to-restrict-exclusive-operation-of-cloud-domain-backed-by-cloud-industry-body/> accessed 15 December 2015.

16 ICANN, ‘GAC Communique – Beijing’ (note 2) 9–11.

17 ICANN, ‘NCSG Comments on Beijing Communiqué’ (note 13).

18 ICANN, ‘Approved Resolutions: Meeting of the New gTLD Program Committee’ (25 June 2013) Item 2c <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-new-gtld-2013-06-25-en> accessed 15 December 2015.

19 Murphy, Kevin. 2013. ‘ICANN Freezes “closed generic” gTLD Bids' (28 June 2013) <http://domainincite.com/13558-icann-freezes-closed-generic-gtld-bids> accessed 15 December 2015.

20 ICANN, ‘Applicants Respond to GAC Category 2 Advice on new gTLDs' (9 October 2013) <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/announcements-and-media/announcement-4-09oct13-en> accessed 15 December 2015.

21 ICANN, ‘GAC Advice: Category 2 Safeguards and Applicant Responses' <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-advice/cat2-safeguards> accessed 15 December 2015.

22 ICANN, ‘GAC Communiqué – Buenos Aires, Argentina’ (20 November 2013) <https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/32637081/FINAL_Buenos_Aires_GAC_Communique_20131120.pdf> accessed 15 December 2015.

23 ICANN, ‘Approved Resolutions | Meeting of the New gTLD Program Committee 21 June 2015’ para 2(a)(2)(b) <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-new-gtld-2015-06-21-en#2.a> accessed 15 December 2015.

24 ICANN, ‘Delegated Strings' (1 October 2014) <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/delegated-strings> accessed 15 December 2015.

25 ICANN, ‘GAC Category 2 Advice Implementation’ (19 March 2014) <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/advisories/gac-cat2-advice-19mar14-en> accessed 15 December 2015.

26 Murphy, Kevin. 2014. ‘Amazon Snubs ICANN Auction to Win .coupon Privately’ (13 June 2014) <http://domainincite.com/16851-amazon-snubs-icann-auction-to-win-coupon-privately> accessed 15 December 2015.

27 ICANN, ‘GAC Communiqué – Singapore’ (27 March 2014) 12 <https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27132037/Final%20Communique%20-%20Singapore%202014.pdf> accessed 15 December 2015.

28 ICANN, ‘GAC Communiqué – Los Angeles, CA, USA’ (15 October 2014) 4 <https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27132037/Los%20Angeles_GAC%20Communique_Final.pdf> accessed 15 December 2015.

29 ICANN, ‘GAC Communiqué – Singapore’ (11 February 2015) 5 <https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27132037/GAC_SINGAPORE52_COMMUNIQUE_FINAL2.pdf> accessed 15 December 2015.

30 Johnson, Greg. 2000. ‘The Costly Game for Net Names'LA Times (Los Angeles, 10 April 2000) <http://articles.latimes.com/2000/apr/10/news/mn-18112> accessed 4 October 2014.

31 Ghalamkarizadeh, Anthonia. 2014. ‘Mixed Weather Forecast for wetteronline.de – Generic Domain Name Protected Under Unfair Competition Law but not Under Name Rights' (27 January 2014) <http://www.marques.org/Class46/Default.asp?XID=BHA3571> accessed 15 December 2015.

32 Taliadoros, Lisa. ‘Upcoming Availability of Generic dot.com.au Domain Names' <http://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/658/upcoming-availability-of-generic-dotcomau-domain-n.aspx> accessed 15 December 2015.

33 au Domain Administration Ltd, ‘2014-3 Reserved List Policy’ (2 May 2014) Section 2 <http://www.auda.com.au/policies/2014-03/> accessed 15 December 2015.

34 au Domain Administration Ltd, ‘2012–04 Domain Name Eligibility and Allocation Policy Rules for Open 2LDs' (17 December 2012) Schedule A, Clause 7 <http://www.auda.org.au/pdf/auda-2012-04.pdf> accessed 15 December 2015.

35 au Domain Administration Ltd, ‘2012-05 Guidelines on the Interpretation of Policy Rules for Open 2LDs' (17 December 2012) 10.5 <http://www.auda.org.au/pdf/auda-2012-05.pdf> accessed 15 December 2015.

36 au Domain Administration Ltd, ‘2008-10 Domain Monetisation Policy’ (30 June 2008) <http://www.auda.com.au/policies/index-of-published-policies/2008-10/> accessed 15 December 2015.

37 auDA ‘Guidelines on Interpretation’ (note 35) Schedule C.

38 Norid, ‘The .no history’ (15 May 2014) <http://www.norid.no/omnorid/historie.en.html> accessed 15 December 2015.

39 Norid, ‘Effects of a Norwegian Domain Name Policy Regulated by Quota’ (5 September 2011) <http://www.norid.no/regelverk/rammer/kvoteanalyse.en.html> accessed 15 December 2015.

40 Norid, ‘Liberalization of the Domain Name Policy – Evaluation Report’ (13 August 2007) 6.3 <http://www.norid.no/regelverk/forslag/liberalisering-1999/evaluering.en.html> accessed 15 December 2015.

41 Norid ‘Domain Name Policy for .no’ (18 June 2014) 5.2 <http://www.norid.no/navnepolitikk.en.html> accessed 15 December 2015.

42 Nominet, ‘Terms and Conditions of Domain Name Registration’ (4 May 2014) 7.4 <http://www.nominet.org.uk/uk-domain-names/registering-uk-domain/legal-details/terms-and-conditions-domain-name-registration> accessed 15 December 2015.

43 Nominet, ‘Rules for the Release of Domain Names at the Second Level in .uk’ (6 May 2014) 5 <http://registrars.nominet.org.uk/sites/default/files/sldr_rules_140507_final_0.pdf> accessed 15 December 2015.

44 National Telecommunications & Information Administration, ‘Improvement of Technical Management of Internet Names and Addresses; Proposed Rule’ (20 February 1998) 8829 <http://www.ntia.doc.gov/federal-register-notice/1998/improvement-technical-management-internet-names-and-addresses-proposed-> accessed 15 December 2015.

45 Regulation 733/2002 of the Parliament and of the Council on the implementation of the .eu top level domain [2002] OJ L 113/1 Article 5(2).

46 Commission Regulation (EC) 560/2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 874/2004 laying down public policy rules concerning the implementation and functions of the .eu Top Level Domain and the principles governing registration.

47 eu TLD Regulation 733/2002 (note 46) Recital 17.

48 Palage, Michael. 2009. ‘New gTLDs: Let the Gaming Begin, Part I: TLD Front-running’ (2009) 16(17) Progress on Point <http://www.pff.org/issues-pubs/pops/2009/pop16.17-new-gTLDs-gaming-front-running.pdf> accessed 15 December 2015.

49 ICANN, ‘Generic Names Supporting Organisation Final Report’ (note 9) 13.

50 ICANN, ‘GNSO Council Teleconference Transcript, 14 February 2013’ 53 <http://gnso.icann.org/en/node/36645> accessed 15 December 2015.

51 Lanham Act 1946, 15 USC §1051 et seq.

52 Federal Trademark Dilution Act 1996 15 USC §1125(c).

53 Panavision International L.P. v Dennis Toeppen, Network Solutions Inc, 141 F.3d 1316 (9th Cir 1998).

54 Panavision v Toeppen (note 59).

55 Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act 1999, 15 USC §1125(d).

56 Jon Postel, ‘RFC 1591: Domain Name System Structure and Delegation’ (March 1994) <https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1591.txt> accessed 15 December 2015.

57 ICANN, ‘Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy’ (30 October 2009) s.4(a)(i) <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/policy-2012-02-25-en> accessed 15 December 2015.

58 ICANN, ‘Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy’ (30 October 2009) 7 <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rules-be-2012-02-25-en> accessed 15 December 2015.

59 Mueller, Milton. 2002. ‘Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP’ (24 June 2002) 19 <http://ccent.syr.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/markle-report-final.pdf> accessed 15 December 2015.

60 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v Walsucks, Walmarket Puerto Rico, Case No. D2000-0477 (WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre 2000).

61 Research in Motion Limited v One Star Global LLC, Case No. D2009-0227 (WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre 2009).

62 Oki Data Americas, Inc v ASD, Inc, Case No. D2001-0903 (WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre 2001).

63 ADT Services AG v ADT Sucks.com Case No. 2001-0213 (WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre 2001).

64 Mueller, M. ‘Success by Default’ (note 65) 2.

65 Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc v Farzad Tabari, Lisa Tabari 610 F.3d 1171 (9th Cir July 8, 2010).

66 WIPO, ‘Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions' (2nd Ed. 2011) 4.1 <http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview2.0> accessed 15 December 2015.

67 F.Hoffman-La Roche AG v Alexandr Grog Case No. 2013-0995 (WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre 2013).

68 Red.com Inc. v Richard Salazar Case No. D2011-0236 (WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre 2011).

69 Eric Goldman, ‘Funky Ninth Circuit Opinion on Domain Names and Nominative Use – Toyota v Tabari’ (14 July 2010) <http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2010/07/funky_ninth_cir.htm> accessed 15 December 2015.

70 ICANN, ‘Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS)’ (1 March 2013) <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/urs/procedure-01mar13-en.pdf> accessed 15 December 2015.

71 ICANN, ‘Objection and Dispute Resolution’ <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/odr> accessed 15 December 2015.

72 Trademark Clearinghouse, ‘Sunrise Services' <http://www.trademark-clearinghouse.com/content/sunrise-services> accessed 15 December 2015.

73 Abercrombie & Fitch Company v Hunting World, Incorporated 537 F.2d 4 (2nd Cir. 1976).

74 Jon Danzig, trading as Look-Hear v Oscar Music and Media Ltd Case No. D2000-0562 (WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre 2000).

75 Lowestfare.com LLC v US Tours & Travel Inc Case No. AF-0284 (eResolution 2000).

76 DotTunes Limited v Amazon EU S.à.r.l. Case No. LRO2013-0065 (WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre 2013).

77 Andrew Allemann, ‘USPTO Wising Up to New TLD Frontrunning’ (23 January 2013) <http://domainnamewire.com/2012/01/23/uspto-wising-up-to-new-tld-frontrunning/> accessed 15 December 2015.

78 Murphy, Kevin. 2012. ‘.bank Trademark Cancelled After “Mistake”’ (20 January 2012) <http://domainincite.com/7450-bank-trademark-canceled-after-mistake> accessed 15 December 2015.

79 Intellectual Property Office, ‘Trade Marks Manual: Domain Names (Registrability of)’ 114 <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/manual-of-trade-marks-practice> accessed 15 December 2015.

80 WIPO, ‘Nice Classification’ <http://www.wipo.int/classifications/nice/en/> accessed 15 December 2015.

81 Apple Corp Ltd v Apple Computers Ltd [2006] EWHC 996 (Ch).

82 Murphy, Kevin. 2013. ‘Ten More New gTLDs get ICANN Contracts' (13 December 2013) <http://domainincite.com/15299-ten-more-new-gtlds-get-icann-contracts> accessed 15 December 2015.

83 Bimbo SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Panrico SA Case C-591/12 P (ECJ 2012).

84 Phillips, Jeremy. 2014. ‘Doughnuts, Rolls (Well Roles) and a Half-Baked Set of Legal Principles' (8 May 2014) <http://ipkitten.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/doughnuts-rolls-and-half-baked-set-of.html> accessed 15 December 2015.

85 Italianer, Alexander.2013. ‘Prepared Remarks on Level Playing Field and Innovation in Technology Markets' (28 Jan 2013) 2 <http://ec.europa.eu/competition/speeches/text/sp2013_01_en.pdf> accessed 15 December 2015.

86 Italianer, A. ‘Level Playing Field and Innovation in Technology Markets' (note 91) 7.

87 Italianer, A. ‘Level Playing Field and Innovation in Technology Markets' (note 91) 2.

88 Italianer, A. ‘Level Playing Field and Innovation in Technology Markets' (note 91) 2.

89 MCI Communications Corp v AT&T 708 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir 1983).

90 Otter Tail Power Co. v United States 410 U.S. 366 (1973).

91 Hecht v Pro-Football Inc. 570 F.2d 982 (D.C. Cir 1977).

92 IMS Health GmbH & Co OHG v NDC Health HmbH & Co KG Case C-418/01 (ECJ 2001).

93 Directive 2002/21/EC of the Parliament and of the Council on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) [2002] OJ L 108/33 Article 14(2).

94 Directive 2002/19/EC of the Parliament and of the Council on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities (Access Directive) [2002] OJ L 108/7 Article 9.

95 Directive 2002/22/EC of the Parliament and of the Council on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive) [2002] OJ L 108/51 Articles 17–19.

96 Verizon Communications v Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP 540 U.S. 398 (2004).

97 Directive 97/33/EC of the Parliament and of the Council on interconnection in telecommunications with regard to ensuring universal service and interoperability through application of the principles of Open Network Provision (ONP) [1997] OJ L 199/32 Recital 25.

98 European Commission, ‘Telecoms: Commission to Cut Number of Regulated Markets in Europe, IP/14/1112’ (9 October 2014) <http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-1112_en.htm> accessed 13 October 2014.

99 Framework Directive 2002/21/EC (note 100) Recital 27.

100 European Commission, ‘Joaquin Almunia: Statement on the Google Investigation’ (5 February 2014) <http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-14-93_en.htm> accessed 15 October 2014.

101 Web.com Group, Inc v Vistaprint Limited Case Nos 50 504 221 13 and 50 504 246 13 (consolidated) (International Centre for Dispute Resolution) 15 (24 Jan 2014).

102 ICANN, ‘First Status Report to the Department of Commerce’ (15 June 1999) III.2 <https://www.icann.org/resources/unthemed-pages/statusreport-1999-06-15-en> accessed 15 December 2015.

103 Lenard, Tom. 2013. ‘Government Advisory Committee (GAC) Beijing Communiqué Inconsistent with ICANN's gTLD Policy’ (14 May 2013) <http://www.circleid.com/posts/20130514_gac_beijing_communique_inconsistent_with_icann/> accessed 15 December 2015.

104 Autorité de la Concurrence, ‘Press release: Online Advertising Market’ (28 October 2010) <http://www.autoritedelaconcurrence.fr/user/standard.php?id_rub=368&id_article=1488> accessed 15 December 2015.

105 European Commission, ‘Joaquin Almunia: Statement on the Google Investigation’ (note 107).

106 Glyn Moody, ‘Big Pharma Given Control of New .pharmacy Domain’ (5 August 2014) <https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140802/03175328088/big-pharma-given-control-new-pharmacy-domain-only-available-to-legitimate-online-pharmacies.shtml> accessed 15 December 2015.

107 Murphy, Kevin. ‘Amazon Snubs ICANN Auction’ (note 26).

108 Berkens, Michael. 2014. ‘National Association of Realtors Wins Rights to the New gTLD .realestate’ (6 October 2014) <http://www.thedomains.com/2014/10/06/national-association-of-realtors-wins-rights-to-the-new-gtld-realestate/> accessed 15 December 2015.

109 Charlton, Graham. 2014. ‘Nominet Explains the Reasons for .uk domains' (2 January 2014) <http://econsultancy.com/blog/64053-nominet-explains-the-reasons-for-uk-domains> accessed 15 December 2015.

110 Nominet, ‘Review of Domain Name Registration Policy and the Terms and Conditions Governing Registration’ 4.16 <http://www.nominet.org.uk/how-participate/policy-development/current-policy-discussions-and-consultations/review-domain> accessed 15 December 2015.

111 Interflora Inc., Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC, Flowers Direct Online Limited [2013] EWHC 1291 (Ch) [50]–[51].

112 Apple Computers, ‘iPad User Guide for iOS 8.1 Software’ (2014) 58 <http://manuals.info.apple.com/MANUALS/1000/MA1595/en_US/ipad_user_guide.pdf> accessed 15 December 2015.

113 Ahlström Osakeyhtiö and others v Commission, Joined cases C-89/85 C-104/85 C-114/85 C-116/85 C-117/85 C-125/85 C-126/85 C-127/85 C-128/85 C-129/85 (ECJ 1993).

114 European Commission, ‘Joaquin Almunia: Statement on the Google Investigation’ (note 107).

115 European Commission, ‘Antitrust: Commission sends Statement of Objections to Google on comparison shopping service’ (15 April 2015) <http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-15-4781_en.htm> accessed 15 December 2015.

116 ICANN, ‘NCSG Comments on Beijing Communiqué’ (note 13).

117 Murphy, Kevin. 2014. ‘.now and .realestate will be restricted, but Donuts keeps .tires open’ (7 October 2014) <http://domainincite.com/17475-now-and-realestate-will-be-restricted-but-donuts-keeps-tires-open> accessed 15 December 2015.

118 Mueller, Milton. 2012. ‘Generic Top Level Domains: Who Should Own .book?’ (19 September 2012) <http://www.internetgovernance.org/2012/09/19/generic-top-level-domains-who-should-own-book/> accessed 15 December 2015.

119 ICANN, ‘WHOIS' <http://whois.icann.org/> accessed 15 December 2015.

120 ICANN, ‘WHOIS' (note 51).

121 Nominet, ‘WHOIS tool’ <http://www.nominet.uk/whois/> accessed 15 December 2015.

122 ausregistry, ‘WHOIS' <http://www.ausregistry.com.au/whois> accessed 15 December 2015.

123 Norid, ‘Whois database’ <http://www.norid.no/domenenavnbaser/whois/index.en.php> accessed 15 December 2015.

124 eurID, ‘WHOIS search’ <http://www.whois.eu/> accessed 15 December 2015.