ABSTRACT
Equity has become a central principle in educational policy and leadership around the world. However, there is a wide range of interpretations of equity and what it means in education. In this article we explore different definitions of educational equity from policy and leadership perspectives. Our aim is to give an operational definition of equity in education to overcome vague interpretations and better guide the development of educational leadership for more consistent approaches to improving equity in education. We argue that equity in education should refer to equity of educational outcomes and incorporate both an individual and a social group aspect. We then claim that equality of outcomes is more relevant to comparisons between social groups than individuals, and we call that social equity. In current literature one or the other aspect has been adopted as an equity objective, but it appears combining the two elements is much less common. This dual objective is unique in the discussion around what equity in education means and how it could guide educational policymaking and leadership.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Correction Statement
This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Pasi Sahlberg
Pasi Sahlberg is professor of education policy at the UNSW Sydney and adjunct professor at the University of Helsinki. He is former director general in Finnish Ministry of Education.
Trevor Cobbold
Trevor Cobbold is National Convenor of Save Our Schools Australia. He held several honorary positions in The Council of Parents and Citizens Associations in Canberra for over 20 years and is a life member of the Council. He worked as an economist for the Australian Government for over 30 years and has extensive experience in economic research and policy analysis.