840
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A DNS assessment of linear relations between filtered reaction rate, flame surface density, and scalar dissipation rate in a weakly turbulent premixed flame

, &
Pages 245-260 | Received 29 Jan 2018, Accepted 26 Aug 2018, Published online: 10 Sep 2018

Figures & data

Figure. 1. Probability Density Function P2(R2,c¯) for a ratio of R2=(ρDcˆ+Wˆ)/(ρuSL|c|ˆ), obtained using Equation (10) at Δ/δL=1.15 and various values of the Reynolds-averaged combustion progress variable c¯, specified in legends.

Figure. 1. Probability Density Function P2(R2,c¯) for a ratio of R2=(∇⋅ρD∇cˆ+Wˆ)/(ρuSL|∇c|ˆ), obtained using Equation (10) at Δ/δL=1.15 and various values of the Reynolds-averaged combustion progress variable c¯, specified in legends.

Figure 2. Probability Density Functions (a) P3(R3,c¯=0.5) and (b) Pω,3(ωˆ=0.15±0.005,R3,c¯=0.5) for a ratio of R3=Wˆ/ρχˆ. Different curves show results obtained using different normalised filter widths Δ/δL, specified in legends.

Figure 2. Probability Density Functions (a) P3(R3,c¯=0.5) and (b) Pω,3(ωˆ=0.15±0.005,R3,c¯=0.5) for a ratio of R3=Wˆ/ρχˆ. Different curves show results obtained using different normalised filter widths Δ/δL, specified in legends.

Figure 3. Reaction rate W/ρu (red double-dashed-dotted line), FSD SLc (black double-dotted-dashed line), SDR ρDcc/ρu (blue dotted-dashed line), and ratios of W/(ρuSLc) (black short-dashed line) and W/(ρDcc) (blue long-dashed line) vs. the normalised distance ξ=xmax{|c|(x)} counted from the position of peak rate W/ρu in the laminar flame that propagates from right to left.

Figure 3. Reaction rate W/ρu (red double-dashed-dotted line), FSD SL∇c (black double-dotted-dashed line), SDR ρD∇c⋅∇c/ρu (blue dotted-dashed line), and ratios of W/(ρuSL∇c) (black short-dashed line) and W/(ρD∇c⋅∇c) (blue long-dashed line) vs. the normalised distance ξ=xmax{|∇c|(x)} counted from the position of peak rate W/ρu in the laminar flame that propagates from right to left.

Figure 4. A 2D sketch of reaction zone (curve) and filter volumes.

Figure 4. A 2D sketch of reaction zone (curve) and filter volumes.

Figure 5. (a) Ratios R3|ρcˆ/ρˆ=Wˆ/ρχˆ|ρcˆ/ρˆ (dotted-dashed and dotted lines) and R4|ρcˆ/ρˆ=(ρDcˆ+Wˆ)/ρχˆ|ρcˆ/ρˆ (dashed and solid lines) conditioned to the filtered combustion progress variable ρcˆ/ρˆ and evaluated using various normalised filter widths Δ/δL specified in legends at the Reynolds-averaged combustion progress variable c¯=0.5. (b) A ratio of R2|ρcˆ/ρˆ=(ρDcˆ+Wˆ)/(ρuSLΣˆ)|ρcˆ/ρˆ conditioned to ρcˆ/ρˆ and evaluated using Δ/δL=1.15 (solid and dashed lines) and 1.73 (dotted-dashed lines) at various values of the Reynolds-averaged combustion progress variable c¯, specified in legends.

Figure 5. (a) Ratios ⟨R3|ρcˆ/ρˆ⟩=⟨Wˆ/ρχˆ|ρcˆ/ρˆ⟩ (dotted-dashed and dotted lines) and ⟨R4|ρcˆ/ρˆ⟩=⟨(∇⋅ρD∇cˆ+Wˆ)/ρχˆ|ρcˆ/ρˆ⟩ (dashed and solid lines) conditioned to the filtered combustion progress variable ⟨ρcˆ/ρˆ⟩ and evaluated using various normalised filter widths Δ/δL specified in legends at the Reynolds-averaged combustion progress variable c¯=0.5. (b) A ratio of ⟨R2|ρcˆ/ρˆ⟩=⟨(∇⋅ρD∇cˆ+Wˆ)/(ρuSLΣˆ)|ρcˆ/ρˆ⟩ conditioned to ⟨ρcˆ/ρˆ⟩ and evaluated using Δ/δL=1.15 (solid and dashed lines) and 1.73 (dotted-dashed lines) at various values of the Reynolds-averaged combustion progress variable c¯, specified in legends.

Figure 6. Mean reaction rate vs. Reynolds-averaged combustion progress variable c¯. 1 – Wˆ¯/ρu. 2 – 2ρχˆ¯/[ρu(2cm1)], where cm=0.88 [Citation27], 3 – R3ρχˆ¯/ρu, where the ratio R3=Wˆ/ρχˆ is averaged over all cells characterised by 0.01<cˆ(x,t)<0.99, 4 – R3¯ρχˆ¯/ρu, where the ratio R3¯(c¯) is averaged over transverse plane provided that 0.01<cˆ(x,t)<0.99. Δ/δL=2.88.

Figure 6. Mean reaction rate vs. Reynolds-averaged combustion progress variable c¯. 1 – Wˆ¯/ρu. 2 – 2ρχˆ¯/[ρu(2cm−1)], where cm=0.88 [Citation27], 3 – ⟨R3⟩ρχˆ¯/ρu, where the ratio ⟨R3⟩=⟨Wˆ/ρχˆ⟩ is averaged over all cells characterised by 0.01<cˆ(x,t)<0.99, 4 – R3¯ρχˆ¯/ρu, where the ratio R3¯(c¯) is averaged over transverse plane provided that 0.01<cˆ(x,t)<0.99. Δ/δL=2.88.

Figure 7. Subgrid conditioned PDFs Pˆ(c|cˆ) obtained at c¯=0.5 and (a) Δ/δL=1.15 or (b) Δ/δL=2.88. Note that the PDFs are shown in linear and logarithmic scales in (a) and (b), respectively. The PDF sampling was performed for all grid points within a filter volume centred around a point x at instant t, followed by averaging the PDFs P(c,x,t) for all x and t such that cˆ+0.005cˆ(x,t)<cˆ+0.005. Values of cˆ are specified in legends.

Figure 7. Subgrid conditioned PDFs Pˆ(c|cˆ) obtained at c¯=0.5 and (a) Δ/δL=1.15 or (b) Δ/δL=2.88. Note that the PDFs are shown in linear and logarithmic scales in (a) and (b), respectively. The PDF sampling was performed for all grid points within a filter volume centred around a point x at instant t, followed by averaging the PDFs P(c,x,t) for all x and t such that cˆ∗+0.005≤cˆ(x,t)<cˆ∗+0.005. Values of cˆ∗ are specified in legends.