3,864
Views
41
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Spatial data fusion in Spatial Data Infrastructures using Linked Data

&
Pages 613-636 | Received 12 Dec 2014, Accepted 12 Aug 2015, Published online: 24 Sep 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. Classification schema for spatial data fusion processes.

Figure 1. Classification schema for spatial data fusion processes.

Figure 2. Low-level subprocesses for spatial data fusion.

Figure 2. Low-level subprocesses for spatial data fusion.

Figure 3. Interaction between SDI (OWS interface) and Semantic Web (RDF interface) components.

Figure 3. Interaction between SDI (OWS interface) and Semantic Web (RDF interface) components.

Figure 4. Proposed components for the formalization of feature relations.

Figure 4. Proposed components for the formalization of feature relations.

Figure 5. Approaches to the management of feature relations between two data sources.

Figure 5. Approaches to the management of feature relations between two data sources.

Figure 6. Usage patterns for spatial data fusion using Linked Data.

Figure 6. Usage patterns for spatial data fusion using Linked Data.

Figure 7. Implemented service infrastructure for spatial data fusion.

Figure 7. Implemented service infrastructure for spatial data fusion.

Figure 8. User-defined orchestration of WPS processes (screenshot).

Figure 8. User-defined orchestration of WPS processes (screenshot).

Listing 1. Simplified RDF Turtle representation of a feature relation.

Listing 1. Simplified RDF Turtle representation of a feature relation.

Figure 9. Sequence diagram for client-based compilation and execution of a data fusion process for defined spatial data sources.

Figure 9. Sequence diagram for client-based compilation and execution of a data fusion process for defined spatial data sources.

Figure 10. Comparison of input datasets based on previously identified relationships (screenshot).

Figure 10. Comparison of input datasets based on previously identified relationships (screenshot).

Figure 11. Identification schema for types of relations between road segments.

Figure 11. Identification schema for types of relations between road segments.

Table 1. Cardinality of relations with regard to the selected confidence threshold.

Listing 2. Pseudo-code of the workflow for the detection and creation of change sets between feature relations.

Listing 2. Pseudo-code of the workflow for the detection and creation of change sets between feature relations.

Listing 3. RDF-encoded relation between two OSM features expressed in terms of change sets.

Listing 3. RDF-encoded relation between two OSM features expressed in terms of change sets.

Listing 4. Sample RDF relation between a polygon feature provided via WFS and an elevation raster provided via WCS.

Listing 4. Sample RDF relation between a polygon feature provided via WFS and an elevation raster provided via WCS.

Figure 12. Feature samples for the city of Dresden considered for the performance evaluation.

Figure 12. Feature samples for the city of Dresden considered for the performance evaluation.

Table 2. Results of the performance evaluation.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.