1,200
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Lost in translation: inadequate non-technical risk assessment within major project teams in mining

, &
Pages 711-724 | Received 12 Aug 2022, Accepted 01 Apr 2023, Published online: 08 May 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Topics most frequently raised by respondents when asked to identify risks considered during the project evaluation stage. Risks were categorized based on number of mentions by project professionals (PP - grey) and sustainability professionals (SP - black). Top environmental risks included water, biodiversity and energy/climate change .Other risks raised where number of mentions were fewer include: reputation (14 total mentions); closure (11 total mentions); health and safety (eight total mentions), corporate governance (six total mentions), catastrophe (five total mentions), exploration (five total mentions), and value chain (two total mentions).

Figure 1. Topics most frequently raised by respondents when asked to identify risks considered during the project evaluation stage. Risks were categorized based on number of mentions by project professionals (PP - grey) and sustainability professionals (SP - black). Top environmental risks included water, biodiversity and energy/climate change .Other risks raised where number of mentions were fewer include: reputation (14 total mentions); closure (11 total mentions); health and safety (eight total mentions), corporate governance (six total mentions), catastrophe (five total mentions), exploration (five total mentions), and value chain (two total mentions).

Figure 2. Reasons given by project professionals (PP) and sustainability professionals (SP) for the undervaluation and/or under representation of NTR in project decisions. Rather than a single root cause, interview participants pointed to a set of interwoven factors.

Figure 2. Reasons given by project professionals (PP) and sustainability professionals (SP) for the undervaluation and/or under representation of NTR in project decisions. Rather than a single root cause, interview participants pointed to a set of interwoven factors.

Table 1. Summary of key points of differentiation in how project professionals and sustainability professions define, assess and measure non-technical risks that both groups agree have the potential for project impairment and capital erosion should community opposition develop.