212
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

How personal experiences shaped risk judgments during COVID-19

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 438-457 | Received 18 Sep 2023, Accepted 25 Apr 2024, Published online: 18 Jun 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. Panel A: COVID-19 incidence in Germany across a two-year time period, starting in March 2020 (the onset of the pandemic in Germany). Vertical dashed lines mark key events: lockdowns, beginning of vaccination rollout, and vaccination progress. The numbers from 1 to 17 indicate the survey waves. Panel B: Average risk judgments in each of the 17 survey waves, plotted separately for ‘direct experience’ and ‘no experience’ of a COVID-19 infection. Error bars represent bootstrapped 95% CIs.

Figure 1. Panel A: COVID-19 incidence in Germany across a two-year time period, starting in March 2020 (the onset of the pandemic in Germany). Vertical dashed lines mark key events: lockdowns, beginning of vaccination rollout, and vaccination progress. The numbers from 1 to 17 indicate the survey waves. Panel B: Average risk judgments in each of the 17 survey waves, plotted separately for ‘direct experience’ and ‘no experience’ of a COVID-19 infection. Error bars represent bootstrapped 95% CIs.

Figure 2. Average risk judgments in each of the 17 survey waves, plotted separately for (in)direct experience and no experience of COVID-19 infection. Error bars represent bootstrapped 95% CIs.

Figure 2. Average risk judgments in each of the 17 survey waves, plotted separately for (in)direct experience and no experience of COVID-19 infection. Error bars represent bootstrapped 95% CIs.

Figure 3. Proportions of participants with each category of experience across the 17 survey waves.

Figure 3. Proportions of participants with each category of experience across the 17 survey waves.

Figure 4. Panel A: Media mentions of ‘COVID*’ and ‘Corona*’ in major German print and online media outlets. Panel B: Sentiment analysis for positive and negative words found in Bild.de and Spiegel.de. Panel C: Google searches for ‘Corona*’ in Germany.

Figure 4. Panel A: Media mentions of ‘COVID*’ and ‘Corona*’ in major German print and online media outlets. Panel B: Sentiment analysis for positive and negative words found in Bild.de and Spiegel.de. Panel C: Google searches for ‘Corona*’ in Germany.

Figure 5. Risk judgments across seven age groups. Error bars represent bootstrapped 95% CIs.

Figure 5. Risk judgments across seven age groups. Error bars represent bootstrapped 95% CIs.

Figure 6. Average fear ratings, plotted separately for ‘direct experience’ and ‘no experience’ of a COVID-19 infection. Error bars represent bootstrapped 95% CIs.

Figure 6. Average fear ratings, plotted separately for ‘direct experience’ and ‘no experience’ of a COVID-19 infection. Error bars represent bootstrapped 95% CIs.

Figure A1. Fear of a life-threatening disease by age group. Error bars represent bootstrapped 95% CIs.

Figure A1. Fear of a life-threatening disease by age group. Error bars represent bootstrapped 95% CIs.

Table A1. Demographic characteristics of participants (N = 15,015).

Table A2. Number of participants per wave.

Table A3. Multilevel model predicting risk judgment by experience of infection (two-way split: direct or no experience).

Table A4. Multilevel model predicting risk judgment by experience of infection (four-way split: direct, family, network, or no experience).

Table A5. Multilevel model predicting risk judgments by media mentions and google searches.