Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Aging Male Volume 23, 2020 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,077
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Effect of senescence on morphological, functional and oxidative features of fresh and cryopreserved canine sperm

Maíra Morales BritoDepartment of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilView further author information
,
Daniel de Souza Ramos AngrimaniDepartment of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilView further author information
,
Bruno Rogério RuiDepartment of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilView further author information
,
Giulia Kiyomi Vechiato KawaiView further author information
,
João Diego Agostini LosanoDepartment of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilView further author information
&
Camila Infantosi VannucchiDepartment of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 279-286 | Received 13 Apr 2018, Accepted 08 Jun 2018, Published online: 11 Jul 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. (A) Sperm linear motility (%), velocity average pathway—VAP (μm s−1) and (B) mitochondrial activity index (%) in the Young and Senile groups. *Difference between groups (p < .05).

Figure 1. (A) Sperm linear motility (%), velocity average pathway—VAP (μm s−1) and (B) mitochondrial activity index (%) in the Young and Senile groups. *Difference between groups (p < .05).

Figure 2. Sperm high mitochondrial membrane potential (%) in (A) fresh semen of the Young and Senile Groups and (B) in fresh and cryopreserved semen of the Senile Group. *Difference between groups (p < .05).

Figure 2. Sperm high mitochondrial membrane potential (%) in (A) fresh semen of the Young and Senile Groups and (B) in fresh and cryopreserved semen of the Senile Group. *Difference between groups (p < .05).

Figure 3. Acrosome membrane integrity (%) in fresh and cryopreserved semen of the Young and Senile groups. *Difference between semen processing (p < .05). +Difference between groups (p < .05).

Figure 3. Acrosome membrane integrity (%) in fresh and cryopreserved semen of the Young and Senile groups. *Difference between semen processing (p < .05). +Difference between groups (p < .05).

Figure 4. Sperm defects (%) in the Young and Senile groups. *Difference between groups (p < .05).

Figure 4. Sperm defects (%) in the Young and Senile groups. *Difference between groups (p < .05).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.