Figures & data
Figure 1. MR images show PDFF (a) and R2* (b) of proximal femur measured in a 76-year-old man with prostate cancer. ROI is manually traced from the femoral head to the horizontal line of the lower end of the lesser trochanter to calculate R2* value and PDFF. PDFF: proton density fat fraction; ROI: region of interest.
![Figure 1. MR images show PDFF (a) and R2* (b) of proximal femur measured in a 76-year-old man with prostate cancer. ROI is manually traced from the femoral head to the horizontal line of the lower end of the lesser trochanter to calculate R2* value and PDFF. PDFF: proton density fat fraction; ROI: region of interest.](/cms/asset/cf758dd4-fd9b-4630-be50-7adbe88e9461/itam_a_2112663_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of study population.
Figure 2. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between BMD (g/cm2), MRI-based R2* value (a) and PDFF (b) in proximal femur. R2* values were significantly correlated with BMD compared with PDFF in prostate cancer patients. BMD: bone mineral density; PDFF: proton density fat fraction.
![Figure 2. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between BMD (g/cm2), MRI-based R2* value (a) and PDFF (b) in proximal femur. R2* values were significantly correlated with BMD compared with PDFF in prostate cancer patients. BMD: bone mineral density; PDFF: proton density fat fraction.](/cms/asset/82acd6cc-55c4-403f-a46b-16659c9610f6/itam_a_2112663_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. AUC of R2* for distinguishing BMD-T score ≤ −2.5 and > −2.5 was estimated to be 0.817, with cut-off values of 50.7 s−1. AUC: area under the curve; BMD: bone mineral density.
![Figure 3. AUC of R2* for distinguishing BMD-T score ≤ −2.5 and > −2.5 was estimated to be 0.817, with cut-off values of 50.7 s−1. AUC: area under the curve; BMD: bone mineral density.](/cms/asset/5c72b7c1-8a37-4c4c-bd87-182087df5ed3/itam_a_2112663_f0003_c.jpg)