https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2209-9983
Figures & data
Figure 1. (a) Over-fed chicken debate: Number of sampled tweets per actor group per month (N = 2107). (b) Kilo stunner debate: Number of sampled tweets per actor group per month (N = 1404).
Table 1. Number of unique authors, hashtags, mentioned usernames, and retweeted usernames in the over-fed chicken and kilo stunner debates.
Figure 2. (a) Co-occurring 67 hashtags and 45 addressed usernames (used ≤ 5 times) in the over-fed chicken debate authored by media, citizens, environmental organizations, eco industry, conventional industry. Kamada-Kawai layout in Pajek, clustering with Newman algorithm in VosViewer, node size proportional to frequency of use, line thickness to strength of co-occurrence. (b) Co-occurring 57 hashtags and 26 addressed usernames (used ≤ 5 times) in the kilo stunner debate authored by media, citizens, environmental organizations, eco industry, conventional industry. Kamada-Kawai layout in Pajek, clustering with Newman algorithm in VosViewer. Node size proportional to frequency of use, line thickness to strength of co-occurrence.
Figure 3. (a) Co-occurring 74 retweeted usernames (used ≤ 2 times) in the over-fed chicken debate authored by media, citizens, environmental organizations, eco industry, conventional industry. Kamada-Kawai layout in Pajek, clustering with Newman algorithm in VosViewer. Node size proportional to frequency of use, line thickness to strength of co-occurrence. (b) Co-occurring 47 retweeted usernames (used ≤ 2 times) in the kilo stunner debate authored by media, citizens, environmental organizations, eco industry, conventional industry. Kamada-Kawai layout in Pajek, clustering with Newman algorithm in VosViewer. Node size proportional to frequency of use, line thickness to strength of co-occurrence.
