Figures & data
Table 1. Number and percentage of respondents in each ethnic group, using 10 ethnic group classifications, Understanding Society, Wave 3 (England).
Figure 1. (a) Percent of ethnic group with mixed-ethnic network, by poverty status and (b) percent of ethnic group with mixed-neighbourhood network, by poverty status.
![Figure 1. (a) Percent of ethnic group with mixed-ethnic network, by poverty status and (b) percent of ethnic group with mixed-neighbourhood network, by poverty status.](/cms/asset/582d4f52-e975-4cd9-9836-523fb9838796/cjms_a_1481002_f0001_ob.jpg)
Figure 2. Deprivation score (IMD) of neighbourhoods of residence for ethnic groups (box plots indicating median, interquartile range and range of deprivation scores).
![Figure 2. Deprivation score (IMD) of neighbourhoods of residence for ethnic groups (box plots indicating median, interquartile range and range of deprivation scores).](/cms/asset/c3c35123-d5c5-4740-969c-f9d1f3e78994/cjms_a_1481002_f0002_ob.jpg)
Figure 3. Percentage of ethnic group living in the most deprived neighbourhoods (bottom 10% on IMD score) by poverty status.
![Figure 3. Percentage of ethnic group living in the most deprived neighbourhoods (bottom 10% on IMD score) by poverty status.](/cms/asset/aa289a90-4b68-4933-82bf-e0b6871bd4ec/cjms_a_1481002_f0003_ob.jpg)
Table 2. Multilevel model showing predictors of an individual’s poverty status: control variables only.
Table 3. Multilevel model showing predictors of an individuals’s poverty status continued: network, neighbourhood and model specific variables.
Figure 4. The likelihood of an individual being poorer by neighbourhood deprivation, for those with and without a mixed neighbourhood social network.
![Figure 4. The likelihood of an individual being poorer by neighbourhood deprivation, for those with and without a mixed neighbourhood social network.](/cms/asset/576f2301-e08a-4039-acd0-39a0184c4f8c/cjms_a_1481002_f0004_ob.jpg)