ABSTRACT
International migration to North America continues to rise, and with it the meeting of different cultural norms surrounding child caregiving and supervision. Previous research shows that high rates of reporting of supervisory neglect involving migrant families may partly result from these different norms and challenges particular to the migrant context. In this study, five focus groups were conducted with migrant caregivers (n = 19) and children aged 12–17 years (n = 25) to explore their experiences surrounding caregiving changes in migration as well as factors that help and hinder child supervision in migrant communities in Montreal, Canada. Results following thematic analysis indicate that family roles change in migration, but that caregivers and children perceive these changes differently. Families perceive and experience discrimination and judgment of their parenting practices from community members and fear that those will be labelled neglectful. Change in families’ social support, especially at the neighbourhood level, has an important influence on caregiving practices. Results also show that parents’ preparation of children to provide care for siblings and others is often not recognised as a strength by service providers in direct contact with families. Directions for future research and implications for practice are discussed.
Acknowledgements
Thank you to the caregivers and youth who participated in the project for sharing their experiences and to our partners at the African-Canadian Development and Prevention Network, Westhaven Community Centre, and the Centre d'aide aux familles latino américaines (CAFLA) for facilitating recruitment. Thank you to the Geographies of Care research team members for providing valuable input throughout the study, to Irene Beeman and Geneviève Grégoire-Labrecque for providing study coordination, and to Nicole D’Souza, Anousheh Machouf, and Clara Juarez for moderation and note taking in focus groups. Thank you to Dr Cécile Rousseau for feedback during the writing of this article.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.