2,895
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Infectious Disease

Cost-effectiveness analysis of implementing an antimicrobial stewardship program in critical care units

, , , , , & show all
Pages 652-659 | Received 13 Dec 2016, Accepted 14 Mar 2017, Published online: 13 Apr 2017

Figures & data

Table 1. Costs, infection rate, and mortality considered in the model.

Figure 1. Short-term decision model.

Figure 1. Short-term decision model.

Table 2. Probability values and fixed applied during probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

Figure 2. Results of short-term univariate analysis. Each horizontal line represents how the variation of the variables affects the final result obtained in the model (–€71,738). The variations considered were 20% for the reason of admission in the critical care unit (Sepsis and NAC) and in the incidence of nosocomial infection, 50% for the reduction in the incidence of CDI, 30% for the reduction of the average cost of antimicrobial treatment, and 10% for the number of patients admitted in the critical care unit.

Figure 2. Results of short-term univariate analysis. Each horizontal line represents how the variation of the variables affects the final result obtained in the model (–€71,738). The variations considered were 20% for the reason of admission in the critical care unit (Sepsis and NAC) and in the incidence of nosocomial infection, 50% for the reduction in the incidence of CDI, 30% for the reduction of the average cost of antimicrobial treatment, and 10% for the number of patients admitted in the critical care unit.

Figure 3. Long-term multivariate analysis results (Cost per LYG).

Figure 3. Long-term multivariate analysis results (Cost per LYG).

Figure 4. Long-term multivariate analysis results (Cost per resistance avoided).

Figure 4. Long-term multivariate analysis results (Cost per resistance avoided).

Figure 5. Predicted proportion of cost-effective antimicrobial stewardship (AS) services at incremental willingness to pay per LYG. Incremental cost-effectiveness of implementing an AS was calculated and compared with standard to compute an ICER.

Figure 5. Predicted proportion of cost-effective antimicrobial stewardship (AS) services at incremental willingness to pay per LYG. Incremental cost-effectiveness of implementing an AS was calculated and compared with standard to compute an ICER.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.