Figures & data
Figure 1. Respondent flow diagram for the study. MS, Multiple sclerosis; NHWS, National Health and Wellness Survey.
![Figure 1. Respondent flow diagram for the study. MS, Multiple sclerosis; NHWS, National Health and Wellness Survey.](/cms/asset/a432d158-898d-48da-92aa-b097e28356fd/ijme_a_1373653_f0001_b.jpg)
Table 1. Description of primary diagnoses in NHWS contributing to CCI.
Table 2. Comparison of respondent characteristics between respondents with MS and controls.
Figure 2. Comparison of 8-item SF-36v2 health profile scores between diagnosed MS respondents to the matched control group. 95% confidence intervals are presented, and all p-values are <.001. Only respondents taking NHWS surveys in 2010–2014 and 2016 were included. MS, Multiple sclerosis.
![Figure 2. Comparison of 8-item SF-36v2 health profile scores between diagnosed MS respondents to the matched control group. 95% confidence intervals are presented, and all p-values are <.001. Only respondents taking NHWS surveys in 2010–2014 and 2016 were included. MS, Multiple sclerosis.](/cms/asset/c329e937-7e74-434b-b257-f31b3727110c/ijme_a_1373653_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 3. Comparison of health-related quality-of-life outcomes between MS patients and controls.
Figure 3. Comparison of health resource utilization and costs between MS patients and matched controls. 95% confidence intervals are presented, and p-values significant at <.001 are indicated with an *. MS, Multiple sclerosis.
![Figure 3. Comparison of health resource utilization and costs between MS patients and matched controls. 95% confidence intervals are presented, and p-values significant at <.001 are indicated with an *. MS, Multiple sclerosis.](/cms/asset/a5acbe3c-c58b-45fe-a4fc-b5a1110d6184/ijme_a_1373653_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Comparison of work productivity and activity impairment between MS patients and controls. 95% confidence intervals are presented, and all p-values <.001. MS, Multiple sclerosis. Only respondents currently employed (full-time, part-time, or self-employed) provided data with respect to absenteeism, presenteeism, and overall work impairment.
![Figure 4. Comparison of work productivity and activity impairment between MS patients and controls. 95% confidence intervals are presented, and all p-values <.001. MS, Multiple sclerosis. Only respondents currently employed (full-time, part-time, or self-employed) provided data with respect to absenteeism, presenteeism, and overall work impairment.](/cms/asset/e4765afd-254f-4e87-a4c1-9d7990b100a8/ijme_a_1373653_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5. (a) Comparison of annual per-patient indirect, direct, and hospital costs. 95% confidence intervals are presented, and all p-values <.001. (b) Comparison of annual per-patient physician costs and ER costs. 95% confidence intervals are presented, and p-values significant at .001 are indicated with an *. ER, Emergency room; MS, Multiple sclerosis.
![Figure 5. (a) Comparison of annual per-patient indirect, direct, and hospital costs. 95% confidence intervals are presented, and all p-values <.001. (b) Comparison of annual per-patient physician costs and ER costs. 95% confidence intervals are presented, and p-values significant at .001 are indicated with an *. ER, Emergency room; MS, Multiple sclerosis.](/cms/asset/5d668b08-b50a-4d63-92fa-93acace0ab00/ijme_a_1373653_f0005_c.jpg)