1,830
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Surgery

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a sealing hemostat patch (HEMOPATCH) vs standard of care in cardiac surgery

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 273-281 | Received 25 Sep 2017, Accepted 01 Nov 2017, Published online: 07 Dec 2017

Figures & data

Table 1. Clinical inputs.

Table 2. Cost inputs—surgery-related costs.

Figure 1. Estimated cost impact of reduced revisions and transfusions using HEMOPATCH vs SOC in an average Italian hospital performing 574 cardiac surgical procedures per year.

Figure 1. Estimated cost impact of reduced revisions and transfusions using HEMOPATCH vs SOC in an average Italian hospital performing 574 cardiac surgical procedures per year.

Figure 2. One-way sensitivity analysis results for (a) an Italian, (b) a Spanish, (c) a French, and (d) a British Hospital Performing 574 Cardiac Surgeries per Year.

Figure 2. One-way sensitivity analysis results for (a) an Italian, (b) a Spanish, (c) a French, and (d) a British Hospital Performing 574 Cardiac Surgeries per Year.

Table 1A. Probability distributions for clinical inputs

Table 2A. Probability distributions for cost inputs.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.