2,426
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cardiovascular

Cost-effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants compared to low-molecular-weight-heparins for treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism in Spain

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 840-847 | Received 12 Apr 2022, Accepted 07 Jun 2022, Published online: 21 Jun 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. Model structure. For each simulated cancer patient, the different VTE treatment states are represented by ellipses and each transition between two states is represented by an arrow between those states.

Figure 1. Model structure. For each simulated cancer patient, the different VTE treatment states are represented by ellipses and each transition between two states is represented by an arrow between those states.

Table 1. Probabilities.

Table 2. Utilities table.

Table 3. Pharmacological cost for short and long term.

Table 4. Costs and effectiveness for each treatment after 12 months.

Figure 2. Tornado diagram based on Net Monetary Benefit. The 10 most sensitive factors that account for most of the variability in the model. DOAC: direct oral anticoagulants compared; LMWH: low-molecular-weight-heparins.

Figure 2. Tornado diagram based on Net Monetary Benefit. The 10 most sensitive factors that account for most of the variability in the model. DOAC: direct oral anticoagulants compared; LMWH: low-molecular-weight-heparins.

Figure 3. Cost-effectiveness plane of DOAC vs. LMWH. It represents the 1000 simulations run by the model and the 95% confidence ellipse that comprises most of them. DOAC: direct oral anticoagulants compared; LMWH: low-molecular-weight-heparins.

Figure 3. Cost-effectiveness plane of DOAC vs. LMWH. It represents the 1000 simulations run by the model and the 95% confidence ellipse that comprises most of them. DOAC: direct oral anticoagulants compared; LMWH: low-molecular-weight-heparins.

Figure 4. Acceptability curves for the LMWH and DOAC. DOAC: direct oral anticoagulants compared; LMWH: low-molecular-weight-heparins.

Figure 4. Acceptability curves for the LMWH and DOAC. DOAC: direct oral anticoagulants compared; LMWH: low-molecular-weight-heparins.