https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0572-5145
Figures & data
Table 1. Attributes and attribute levels for the conjoint analysis in the survey.
Figure 1. Example of choice task questions for the conjoint analysis in the survey. Each respondent was presented with two different cards with illustrations and asked to select the preferable card. Twenty sets of conjoint cards were presented to each respondent.
Table 2. Number of respondents by gender and age group for men (A) and women (B).
Table 3. Degree of pain (A), experiences of hypophosphatemia (B), and skin discoloration by the drug solution (C) due to intravenous iron infusion treatment.
Figure 2. Utility of each level for each attribute for main respondents (Group 1).
Table 4. Utility of each level for each attribute for patients with iron-deficiency anemia undergoing intravenous iron treatment (Group 2; A) and those not receiving intravenous iron treatment (Group 3; B).
Table 5. Estimation of utilities and intangible costs for one intravenous iron treatment episode assuming commercially available intravenous iron treatments (A) and when changing the number of required infusions and the incidence of hypophosphatemia of drug B (B).