1,952
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Infectious Diseases

Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of switching from bivalent to nonavalent vaccine for human papillomavirus in Norway: incorporating the full health impact of all HPV-related diseases

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , & show all
Pages 1085-1098 | Received 18 Jul 2023, Accepted 17 Aug 2023, Published online: 05 Sep 2023

Figures & data

Table 2. Deaths averted by nonavalent vaccination over 100 years.

Figure 1. Flow chart for cervical cancer screening via HPV DNA testing. Abbreviation. hrHPV, high risk HPV genotypes

Figure 1. Flow chart for cervical cancer screening via HPV DNA testing. Abbreviation. hrHPV, high risk HPV genotypes

Table 5. Cost-effectiveness of nonavalent vaccination over 100 years.

Table 1. Cases averted by nonavalent vaccination over 100 years.

Figure 2. Incidence of cervical cancer attributable to nonavalent vaccine types over 100 years. Abbreviations. HPV, human papillomavirus; XP, cross-protection The 2vHPV low and high XP curves are superimposed because they have the same effect on cervical cancer.

Figure 2. Incidence of cervical cancer attributable to nonavalent vaccine types over 100 years. Abbreviations. HPV, human papillomavirus; XP, cross-protection The 2vHPV low and high XP curves are superimposed because they have the same effect on cervical cancer.

Figure 3. Incidence of noncervical cancers attributable to nonavalent vaccine types over 100 years.Abbreviations. HPV, human papillomavirus; XP, cross-protection. In panel A, the 2vHPV low and high XP curves are superimposed because they have the same effect on noncervical cancer in females. In panel B, the 2vHPV, 2vHPV low XP, and high XP curves are superimposed because they have the same effect on cancer in males.

Figure 3. Incidence of noncervical cancers attributable to nonavalent vaccine types over 100 years.Abbreviations. HPV, human papillomavirus; XP, cross-protection. In panel A, the 2vHPV low and high XP curves are superimposed because they have the same effect on noncervical cancer in females. In panel B, the 2vHPV, 2vHPV low XP, and high XP curves are superimposed because they have the same effect on cancer in males.

Figure 4. Incidence of HPV6/11-attributable genital warts and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis over 100 years. Abbreviations. HPV, human papillomavirus; RRP, recurrent respiratory papillomatosis 2vHPV is shown without cross-protection.

Figure 4. Incidence of HPV6/11-attributable genital warts and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis over 100 years. Abbreviations. HPV, human papillomavirus; RRP, recurrent respiratory papillomatosis 2vHPV is shown without cross-protection.

Table 3. Total costs associated with each vaccination strategy over 100 years.

Table 4. Treatment costs averted versus bivalent vaccination over 100 years.

Figure 5. Sensitivity analysis of diseases included. Abbreviations. GW, genital warts; HPV, human papillomavirus; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; NOK, Norwegian krone; QALY, quality-adjusted life year; RRP, recurrent respiratory papillomatosis; XP, cross-protection. Female-specific cancers are cervical, vaginal, and vulvar cancers.

Figure 5. Sensitivity analysis of diseases included. Abbreviations. GW, genital warts; HPV, human papillomavirus; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; NOK, Norwegian krone; QALY, quality-adjusted life year; RRP, recurrent respiratory papillomatosis; XP, cross-protection. Female-specific cancers are cervical, vaginal, and vulvar cancers.

Figure 6. Premium price analysis. Abbreviations. HPV, human papillomavirus; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; NOK, Norwegian krone; QALY, quality-adjusted life year; XP, cross-protection The small dashed lines link the current (base case) price difference between the nonavalent and bivalent vaccines (554 NOK) to the corresponding ICERs. The large dashed line indicates the WTP threshold for low-severity diseases (275,000 NOK). The calculated data range from no price difference (0 NOK) to a price difference 70% higher than the base case (942 NOK).

Figure 6. Premium price analysis. Abbreviations. HPV, human papillomavirus; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; NOK, Norwegian krone; QALY, quality-adjusted life year; XP, cross-protection The small dashed lines link the current (base case) price difference between the nonavalent and bivalent vaccines (554 NOK) to the corresponding ICERs. The large dashed line indicates the WTP threshold for low-severity diseases (275,000 NOK). The calculated data range from no price difference (0 NOK) to a price difference 70% higher than the base case (942 NOK).
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (339.6 KB)

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (193.6 KB)

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or its supplementary materials.