1,292
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Oncology

Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab and ipilimumab versus pembrolizumab and axitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma with intermediate or poor prognostic risk: a Brazilian private healthcare system perspective

, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , & show all
Pages 1108-1121 | Received 05 Jul 2023, Accepted 24 Aug 2023, Published online: 09 Sep 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Model structure. Abbreviations. PF, progression-free state; PD, progressed disease state.

Figure 1. Model structure. Abbreviations. PF, progression-free state; PD, progressed disease state.

Table 1. Treatment effect modifiers assessed in CheckMate 214 trial’s intermediate/poor-risk population.

Table 2. Drug acquisition costs for 1 L treatments (source: CMED 2022).

Table 3. Follow-up visit and laboratory test unit costs.

Figure 2. KM data for KEYNOTE-426 and matched and unmatched CheckMate 214; top: OS, middle: PFS, bottom: TTD.

Figure 2. KM data for KEYNOTE-426 and matched and unmatched CheckMate 214; top: OS, middle: PFS, bottom: TTD.

Figure 3. Survival models used in the base case, fit the adjusted NIVO + IPI data and the PEM + AXI data from KEYNOTE-426; top: OS, middle: PFS, bottom: TTD.

Figure 3. Survival models used in the base case, fit the adjusted NIVO + IPI data and the PEM + AXI data from KEYNOTE-426; top: OS, middle: PFS, bottom: TTD.

Table 4. Base case results.

Figure 4. Deterministic sensitivity analysis for NIVO + IPI vs PEM + AXI: incremental costs.

Figure 4. Deterministic sensitivity analysis for NIVO + IPI vs PEM + AXI: incremental costs.

Figure 5. Deterministic sensitivity analysis for NIVO + IPI vs PEM + AXI: incremental QALYs.

Figure 5. Deterministic sensitivity analysis for NIVO + IPI vs PEM + AXI: incremental QALYs.

Figure 6. Scatter plot of incremental costs and QALYs of NIVO + IPI vs. PEM + AXI.

Figure 6. Scatter plot of incremental costs and QALYs of NIVO + IPI vs. PEM + AXI.

Figure 7. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.

Figure 7. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (675.7 KB)