Abstract
In most books and papers about the separation process of infants and young children, the focus is on the relationship between parents and children. In this Viennese research about toddlers’ transitions from home care to day care, the impact of relational experiences became increasingly evident in the way young children experience, and work through, separation. Against that background observational material is used to describe interactions between observed children and caregivers as well as interactions between the children and their peers. The paper also discusses ways in which peer relationships were helpful or not for toddlers struggling with primitive anxieties and other strong feelings. The paper goes on to consider young child observation used as a single-case research tool in order to develop a more general theory. It takes into account endeavours to develop a theory already undertaken by Esther Bick and in many subsequent publications where observational material is discussed. Methodological investigations of this issue, however, are rare. The authors argue that the acceptability of using the Tavistock Observation Model as a research tool is supported by discussing its methodology.
Acknowledgement
The authors are grateful for the stimulating comments. The authors also want to thank Trudy Klauber for her editorial support.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
2. On this point, see the volume edited by Urwin and Sternberg (Citation2012), which is entirely devoted to research matters. Relevant articles can also be found in the volumes by Rustin and Bradley (Citation2008), Diem-Wille (Citation2009, Citation2011), Diem-Wille and Turner (Citation2009, Citation2012) and Adamo and Rustin (Citation2014). Relating to point (1) see, for example, Lazar (Citation2000), M. J. Rustin (Citation2002, Citation2006), Elfer (Citation2011) and the dispute between Groarke (Citation2008, Citation2011) and M. J. Rustin (Citation2011a, Citation2011b). With reference to point (2) see, for example, Urwin (Citation2007) and Elfer (Citation2007, Citation2010, Citation2011, Citation2014).
3. These are the working group of the ‘Institute of Instructional and School Development’ of the ‘Alpen-Adria University in Klagenfurt’, directed by Gertraud Diem-Wille and by Agnes Turner (since 2012), and the research unit ‘Psychoanalysis and Education’ of the Department of Education at the University of Vienna, chaired by Wilfried Datler.
6. We are very grateful to Ellen Weizsaecker (Citation2010) for her committed contribution to this project and for her careful work in the single-case study she published.
7. The first number after the date indicates the number of the observation from which the quotation is taken. The number after the slash refers to the page of the report from which the passage has been extracted.
8. With reference to psychoanalytic and developmental-psychological theories, it was assumed that the transitional processes from home care to out-of-home day care is experienced by infants and young children as a painful process of separation, so that the transition can be considered to be successful if a child succeeds, alone or with someone’s assistance, in (1) experiencing and expressing pleasure and enjoyment in their new care environment; (2) exploring and investigating situations in their new environment with interest; and (3) taking part in interactions with peers and adults.
Briggs, S. (1997a). Growth and risk in infancy. London: Jessica Kingsley. Reid, S. (Ed.). (1997a). Developments in infant observation: The Tavistock Model. London and New York: Routledge. Urwin, C., & Sternberg, J. (Eds.). (2012). Infant observation and research. Emotional processes in everyday lives. London: Routledge. Rustin, M. E., & Bradley, J. (Ed.). (2008). Work discussion. London: Karnac. Diem-Wille, G. (2009). Das Kleinkind und seine Eltern. Perspektiven psychoanalytischer Beobachtungen [The toddler and its parents. Perspectives of psychoanalytic observation]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. Diem-Wille, G. (2011). The early years of life – Psychoanalytical development theory according to Freud, Klein, and Bion. London: Karnac. Diem-Wille, G., & Turner, A. (Eds.). (2009). Ein-Blicke in die Tiefe. Die Methode der psychoanalytischen Säuglingsbeobachtung und ihre Anwendungen [Looking into the depths. Psychoanalytic infant observation and its applications]. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. Diem-Wille, G., & Turner, A. (Eds.). (2012). Die Methode der psychoanalytischen Beobachtung. Über die Bedeutung von Containment, Identifikation, Abwehr und anderen Phänomenen in der psychoanalytischen Beobachtung [The method of psychoanalytic observation. On the significance of containment, identification, defence and other phenomena]. Wien: Facultas. Adamo, S., & Rustin, M.E. (Eds.). (2014). Young child observation. A development in theory and method of infant observation. London: Karnac. Lazar, R.A. (2000). Erforschen und Erfahren: Teilnehmende Säuglingsbeobachtung – ‚Empathietraining’ oder empirische Forschungsmethode? [Explore and experience: Participant infant observation – empathy-training or empirical research?]. Analytische Kinder und Jugendlichen Psychotherapie [Analytical Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy], 31, 399–417. Rustin, M. J. (2002). Looking in the right place: Complexity theory, psychoanalysis, and infant observation. In A. Briggs (Ed.), Surviving space. Papers on infant observation. Essays on the centenary of Esther Bick (pp. 256–278). London: Karnac. Rustin, M. J. (2006). Infant observation research: What have we learned so far? Infant Observation, 9(1), 35–52. doi:10.1080/13698030600593856 Elfer, P. (2011). Psychoanalytic methods of observation as a research tool for exploring young children’s day care center experience. International Journal in Social Research Methodology, 14, 1–14. Groarke, S. (2008). Psychoanalytical infant observation: A critical assessment. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 10, 299–321. doi:10.1080/13642530802577042 Groarke, S. (2011). Understanding babies from the standpoint of experience. Infant Observation, 14, 163–177. doi:10.1080/13698036.2011.583431 Rustin, M. J. (2011a). In defence of infant observational research. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 13, 153–167. doi:10.1080/13642537.2011.572444 Rustin, M. J. (2011b). Infant observation and research: A reply to Steven Groarke. Infant Observation, 14, 179–190. doi:10.1080/13698036.2011.583433 Urwin, C. (Ed.). (2007). Becoming a mother: Changing identities: Infant observation in a research project (special issue). Infant Observation, 10, 231–334. doi:10.1080/13698030701699362 Elfer, P. (2007). Babies and young children in nurseries: Using psychoanalytic ideas to explore Tasks and interactions. Children & Society, 21(2), 111–122. Elfer, P. (2010). The power of psychoanalytic conceptions in understanding nurseries. Infant Observation, 13(1), 59–63. doi:10.1080/13698031003606634 Elfer, P. (2011). Psychoanalytic methods of observation as a research tool for exploring young children’s day care center experience. International Journal in Social Research Methodology, 14, 1–14. Elfer, P. (2014). Young children’s relationships with staff and peers in day care center: Observations of two girls aged 29 months and 25 months. In S. Adamo & M. Rustin (Eds.), Young child observation. A development in theory and method of infant observation (pp. 274–294). London: Karnac. Datler, W., Datler, M., & Funder, A. (2010). Struggling against the feeling of becoming lost: A young boy’s painful transition to day care. Infant Observation, 13(1), 65–87. doi:10.1080/13698031003606659 Datler, W., Ereky-Stevens, K., Hover-Reisner, N., & Malmberg, L.-E. (2012). Toddlers’ transition to out-of-home day care: Settling into a new care environment. Infant Behavior and Development, 35, 439–451. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.02.007 Datler, W., Datler, M., Hover-Reisner, N., & Trunkenpolz, K. (2014). Observation according to the Tavistock model as a research tool: Remarks on methodology, education and the training of researchers. Infant Observation, 17, 195–214. doi:10.1080/13698036.2014.977558 Datler, W., Lazar, R. A., & Trunkenpolz, K. (2012). Observing in nursing homes: The use of single case studies and organisational observation as a research tool. In C. Urwin & J. Sternberg (Eds.), Infant observation and research. Emotional processes in everyday lives (pp. 160–170). London: Routledge. Trunkenpolz, K., Datler, W., Funder, A., & Hover-Reisner, N. (2009). Von der Infant Observation zur Altersforschung: Die psychoanalytische Methode des Beobachtens nach dem Tavistock-Konzept im Kontext von Forschung [From infant observation to old age research: The Tavistock model of psychoanalytic observation in the context of research]. Zeitschrift für Individualpsychologie/Journal of Individual Psychology, 34, 331–350. Weizsaecker, E. (2010). Ein Tiger im Schildkrötenpanzer? Über die Bedeutung des auffallend stillen Verhaltens eines 2 Jahre und 2 Monate alten Jungen während der Eingewöhnung in die Kinderkrippe. Eine Einzelfallstudie [A Tiger in a turtle shell? On the importance of the strikingly silent behaviour of a boy of 2 year, 2 months during his transition to the nursery. A single case study] (Diploma theses). Department of Education, University of Vienna, Austria. Additional information
Funding
This paper is based on the research project ‘Toddlers’ Adjustment to Out-of-Home Care’, financed by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) and run by Wilfried Datler (Department of Education/Research Unit ‘Psychoanalysis and Education’) in cooperation with Lieselotte Ahnert (Department of Developmental Psychology) at the University of Vienna. Members of the research team were Nina Hover-Reisner (project coordination), Katharina Ereky-Stevens, Tina Eckstein-Madry, Antonia Funder, Maria Fürstaller, Michael Wininger, Margit Datler, Tamara Katschnig and Gregor Kappler. For further information see:
http://www.univie.ac.at/wiki-projekt/?section=home