A survey of neuropsychological assessment feedback practices among neuropsychologists

Abstract

Objective

Feedback on neuropsychological assessment is a critical part of clinical practice, but there are few empirical papers on neuropsychological feedback practices. We sought to fill this gap in the literature by surveying practicing neuropsychologists in the United States. Questions addressed how they provide verbal and written feedback to patients and referral sources. Survey questions also addressed billing practices and training in the provision of feedback.

Methods

A survey was developed using Qualtrics XM to survey currently licensed, independently practicing clinical neuropsychologists in the United States about their feedback practices. The survey was completed by 184 individuals.

Results

Nearly all respondents reported that they provide verbal feedback to patients, most often in-person, within three weeks following testing. Typically, verbal feedback sessions with patients last 45 min. Verbal feedback was provided to referrals by about half of our sample, typically via a brief phone call. Most participants also reported providing written feedback to both the patient and referring provider, most commonly via the written report within three weeks after testing. Regarding billing, most respondents use neuropsychological testing evaluation codes. The COVID-19 pandemic appeared to have had a limited impact on the perceived effectiveness and quality of verbal feedback sessions. Finally, respondents reported that across major stages of professional development, training in the provision of feedback gradually increased but was considered inadequate by many participants.

Conclusions

Results provide an empirical summary of the “state of current practice” for providing neuropsychological assessment feedback. Further experimental research is needed to develop an evidence-base for effective feedback practices.

Keywords:

• Feedback
• neuropsychological assessment
• survey
• practices
• training

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge that our research follows in the footsteps of Karen Postal, Ph.D., ABPP-CN, who recently passed away. She contributed substantially to the neuropsychological assessment feedback literature and the field of neuropsychology at large.

Authors’ disclaimer

The view, opinions and/or findings contained in this article are those of the authors and should not be construed as an official position, policy or decision of the University of Missouri, Regent University, Cleveland Clinic, or Emory University.

Disclosure statement

Internal funding from the University of Missouri-Columbia was used to provide compensation for survey respondents’ time (i.e. $5 Amazon e-gift card). Additionally, Cady Block receives book royalties from APA Publishing. Andrew Kiselica has a grant from the National Institute on Aging IMPACT Collaboratory (UC401) that funds his research time.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Additional information

Funding

Internal funding from the University of Missouri-Columbia was used to provide compensation for survey respondents’ time (i.e. $5 Amazon e-gift card).