Publication Cover
Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems
Methods, Tools and Applications in Engineering and Related Sciences
Volume 20, 2014 - Issue 4
526
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Index-aware model order reduction for differential-algebraic equations

, , &
Pages 345-373 | Received 16 Jul 2012, Accepted 24 Jul 2013, Published online: 20 Aug 2013

Figures & data

Figure 1. Frequency response.

Figure 1. Frequency response.

Figure 2. Comparison of the output solutions, u(t)=10sin(t),t0,2π.

Figure 2. Comparison of the output solutions, u(t)=10sin(t),t∈0,2π.

Figure 3. Approximation error.

Figure 3. Approximation error.

Table 1. Dimension of IMOR model.

Figure 4. Sparsity of matrix pencil (E,A).

Figure 4. Sparsity of matrix pencil (E,A).

Figure 5. Sparsity of matrix pencil (E˜,A˜).

Figure 5. Sparsity of matrix pencil (E˜,A˜).

Figure 6. Sparsity of matrix pencil (E˜r,A˜r) of IMOR model.

Figure 6. Sparsity of matrix pencil (E˜r,A˜r) of IMOR model.

Figure 7. Sparsity of matrix pencil (Er,Ar) of PRIMA model.

Figure 7. Sparsity of matrix pencil (Er,Ar) of PRIMA model.

Table 2. Computational time (in seconds).

Figure 8. Frequency response and its error: (a) Frequency response. (b) frequency response error.

Figure 8. Frequency response and its error: (a) Frequency response. (b) frequency response error.

Figure 9. Output Solutions, input function u(t)=sin(t),t0,π. (a) Output solution y(t). (b) approximation error.

Figure 9. Output Solutions, input function u(t)=sin(t),t∈0,π. (a) Output solution y(t). (b) approximation error.

Table 3. Dimension of IMOR model.

Figure 10. Sparsity of matrix pencil (E,A).

Figure 10. Sparsity of matrix pencil (E,A).

Figure 11. Sparsity of matrix pencil (E˜,A˜).

Figure 11. Sparsity of matrix pencil (E˜,A˜).

Figure 12. Sparsity of matrix pencil (E˜r,A˜r) of IMOR model.

Figure 12. Sparsity of matrix pencil (E˜r,A˜r) of IMOR model.

Figure 13. Sparsity of matrix pencil (Er,Ar) of PRIMA model.

Figure 13. Sparsity of matrix pencil (Er,Ar) of PRIMA model.

Figure 14. Frequency response and its error. (a) Frequency response (b) frequency response error.

Figure 14. Frequency response and its error. (a) Frequency response (b) frequency response error.

Figure 15. Output solutions of the index-aware model and original model. (a) y1(t), (b) y2(t), (c) y3(t), (d) y4(t).

Figure 15. Output solutions of the index-aware model and original model. (a) y1(t), (b) y2(t), (c) y3(t), (d) y4(t).

Figure 16. Approximation error.

Figure 16. Approximation error.

Table 4. Computational time (in seconds).

Figure 17. Transfer function from bleed actuation to average throat Mach number for supersonic diffuser. (a) Frequency response, (b) phase lag.

Figure 17. Transfer function from bleed actuation to average throat Mach number for supersonic diffuser. (a) Frequency response, (b) phase lag.

Figure 18. Approximation error.

Figure 18. Approximation error.

Figure 19. Frequency response and its error. (a) Frequency response, (b) phase response.

Figure 19. Frequency response and its error. (a) Frequency response, (b) phase response.

Figure 20. Approximation error.

Figure 20. Approximation error.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.