Publication Cover
Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems
Methods, Tools and Applications in Engineering and Related Sciences
Volume 29, 2023 - Issue 1
420
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Modeling and analysis of thin film flow of Fuzzified Johnson Segalman nanofluid using fuzzy extension of He-Laplace scheme

, , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 286-314 | Received 13 Apr 2023, Accepted 23 Oct 2023, Published online: 01 Dec 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Geometry of the problem.

Figure 1. Geometry of the problem.

Table 1. Thermophysical properties of base fluid and nanoparticles.

Table 2. Fuzzy solutions and residual errors for the influence of ϕ (lifting problem) when r=0.7 We = 0.01, St = 0.001 and λ = 0.1.

Table 3. Fuzzy solutions and residual errors for the influence of St (lifting problem) when We = 0.001, ϕ = 0.3 and λ=18.

Table 4. Fuzzy solutions and residual errors of the membership function under the influence of λ (lifting problem) when St = 0.001 We = 0.002 and ϕ=0.03.

Table 5. Fuzzy solutions and residual errors of the membership function under the influence of We (lifting problem) when St = 0.001 λ = 0.99 and ϕ=0.1.

Table 6. Fuzzy flow rate in lifting and drainage case when ϕ=0.6, We = 0.5, St = 0.3 and λ = 0.1.

Table 7. Fuzzy solutions and residual errors for the influence of ϕ (drainage problem) when We = 0.01, St = 0.001 and λ = 0.2.

Table 8. Fuzzy solutions and residual errors for the influence of St (draining problem) when We = 0.002, ϕ = 0.3 and λ=0.84.

Table 9. Fuzzy solutions and residual errors of the membership function under the influence of λ (draining problem) when St = 0.001 We = 0.002 and ϕ=0.03.

Table 10. Fuzzy solutions and residual errors of the membership function under the influence of We (draining problem) when St = 0.001 λ = 0.99 and ϕ=0.11.

Table 11. Comparison of HLM with ADM.

Figure 2. Influence of increasing We on flow rate (lifting case) when ϕ=8, λ=1.45, We=0.3 and St =0.5.

Figure 2. Influence of increasing We on flow rate (lifting case) when ϕ=8, λ=1.45, We=0.3 and St =0.5.

Figure 7. Influence of increasing λ on triangular membership function (lifting case) for ϕ=2, X=1, We=0.3 and St =1.

Figure 7. Influence of increasing λ on triangular membership function (lifting case) for ϕ=2, X=1, We=0.3 and St =1.

Figure 8. Influence of ϕ on triangular membership function (lifting case) for λ=0.1, x=0.5, We=1 and St=0.2.

Figure 8. Influence of ϕ on triangular membership function (lifting case) for λ=0.1, x=0.5, We=1 and St=0.2.

Figure 9. Influence of increasing We on flow rate (draining case) when ϕ=4, λ=1.3 and St=0.5.

Figure 9. Influence of increasing We on flow rate (draining case) when ϕ=4, λ=1.3 and St=0.5.

Figure 10. Influence of λ on fuzzy velocity profile (draining case) when r=0.4, ϕ = 0.03 and We=0.4.

Figure 10. Influence of λ on fuzzy velocity profile (draining case) when r=0.4, ϕ = 0.03 and We=0.4.

Figure 11. Influence of St on fuzzy velocity profile (draining case) when λ=0.2,r=0.4, ϕ = 0.2 and We=1.0.

Figure 11. Influence of St on fuzzy velocity profile (draining case) when λ=0.2,r=0.4, ϕ = 0.2 and We=1.0.

Figure 12. Influence of We on fuzzy velocity profile (draining case) when λ=0.14, r=0.2, ϕ = 2 and St =0.9.

Figure 12. Influence of We on fuzzy velocity profile (draining case) when λ=0.14, r=0.2, ϕ = 2 and St =0.9.

Figure 13. Influence of increasing ϕ on fuzzy velocity profile (draining case) for r=0.53, λ=3 We=0.98 and St =0.65.

Figure 13. Influence of increasing ϕ on fuzzy velocity profile (draining case) for r=0.53, λ=3 We=0.98 and St =0.65.

Figure 14. Influence of increasing λ on triangular membership function (draining case) for ϕ=2, x=1, We=0.3 and St =1.

Figure 14. Influence of increasing λ on triangular membership function (draining case) for ϕ=2, x=1, We=0.3 and St =1.

Figure 3. Influence of λ on fuzzy velocity profile (lifting case) when r=0.75, St=1, ϕ = 0.03 and We =0.4.

Figure 3. Influence of λ on fuzzy velocity profile (lifting case) when r=0.75, St=1, ϕ = 0.03 and We =0.4.

Figure 4. Influence of ϕ on fuzzy velocity profile (lifting case) when r=0.24, St=0.2, λ = 0.01 and We =1.

Figure 4. Influence of ϕ on fuzzy velocity profile (lifting case) when r=0.24, St=0.2, λ = 0.01 and We =1.

Figure 5. Influence of St on fuzzy velocity profile (lifting case) when λ=0.2,r=0.51, ϕ = 0.3 and We =1.0.

Figure 5. Influence of St on fuzzy velocity profile (lifting case) when λ=0.2,r=0.51, ϕ = 0.3 and We =1.0.

Figure 6. Influence of We on fuzzy velocity profile (lifting case) when λ=0.1,r=0.6, ϕ = 4 and St =0.5.

Figure 6. Influence of We on fuzzy velocity profile (lifting case) when λ=0.1,r=0.6, ϕ = 4 and St =0.5.