Flirting with Climate Change: A Comparative Policy Analysis of Subnational Governments in Canada and Australia

Abstract

The widely held view is that effective action on climate change requires commitment by national governments to international agreements. Developed nations like Canada and Australia continue to fall short in their commitments to emissions reduction targets established under the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. Australia refused to ratify its Kyoto commitments until 2008 and Canada withdrew its commitment in 2011. Subnational governments in both countries have been active in developing policy responses to climate change yet remain largely excluded as serious policy partners in national mitigation and adaptation initiatives. This paper utilizes Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework to consider why subnational governments address climate change and the main factors shaping their policy choices. The experiences of the Australian state of Victoria and the Canadian province of Ontario provide examples through which to explore the factors contributing to climate policy opportunities and constraints faced by subnational governments in these countries.

Keywords:

• Canada
• Australia
• Westminster
• subnational governments
• comparative climate change policy

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Stephen Jones

Stephen Jones is Lecturer in Public Sector Management at the Business School, University of Queensland, Australia. His research interests tend to focus on policy analysis, intergovernmental cooperation, performance management and public sector reform.